Congress Restores Some Funding for International Food Aid | Civil Eats
Workers at the World Food Programme collect and distribute USAID food items in Ethiopia in 2015. (Photo CC-licensed by Petterik Wiggers, World Food Programme)

Congress Restores Some Funding for International Food Aid

Senators removed funding cuts to Food for Peace, as well as to other programs that buy grain from American farmers.

July 18, 2025 – Republicans in Congress passed a controversial rescissions package last night that will claw back money previously allocated, primarily to public media and foreign aid. It is now on its way to be signed into law by President Trump. But while the original package included deep cuts to two food aid programs run by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), Republicans in the Senate amended the bill to keep them funded.

Unlock the Full Story with a Civil Eats Membership

Expand your understanding of food systems as a Civil Eats member. Enjoy unlimited access to our groundbreaking reporting, engage with experts, and connect with a community of changemakers.

Join today

“While this legislation provides the administration flexibility on which funds they can return, I included an amendment that clarifies that funding will not be taken from the administration of commodity-based programs like Food for Peace and McGovern-Dole that provide a critical market for our farmers to sell excess commodities to feed hungry people around the world,” Senator Jerry Moran (R-Kansas) said in a press release.

The rescissions process is being used as a way to give Congressional authority to the Trump administration’s spending cuts. With the help of Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), Trump began dismantling USAID soon after he took office, and the agency was shuttered on June 30. In a May budget proposal, President Trump proposed eliminating Food for Peace and the McGovern-Dole International Food for Education program, which funds school meals in low-income countries.

banner showing a radar tracking screen and the words
Staff in Uzbekistan unload a shipment of USAID food assistance in 2020. (Photo CC-licensed by USAID Central Asia on Flickr)

Staff in Uzbekistan unload a shipment of USAID food assistance in 2020. (Photo CC-licensed by USAID Central Asia on Flickr)

However, unlike with other cuts to foreign aid, some Republicans have pushed back on defunding the food programs because they purchase billions of dollars in commodities from farmers in their states. In early July, The New York Times reported that Kansas farmers who lost Food for Peace contracts were looking into dog food as a new market for their grains.

In the press release, Moran pointed out that the recently passed Senate appropriations bill allocating agriculture funding for next year also preserved funding for the Food for Peace and McGovern-Dole programs. Senators included a requirement that the administration provide a report on what it would take to transfer Food for Peace to the U.S. Department of Agriculture. A team at the State Department is currently running the remaining USAID programs.

The rescissions package’s zeroing out of funding for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting is expected to hit the small, rural affiliates of National Public Radio (NPR) the hardest, since federal funding generally makes up a larger portion of their budgets. The total cuts saved $9 billion, which is about .1 percent of the federal government’s $7 trillion in annual spending. (Link to this post.)

We’ll bring the news to you.

Get the weekly Civil Eats newsletter, delivered to your inbox.

You’d be a great Civil Eats member…

Civil Eats is a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, and we count on our members to keep producing our award-winning work.

Readers like you are the reason why we’re able to keep digging deep into stories you won’t find anywhere else. When you become a member, your support directly funds our journalism—from paying our reporters to keeping the internet on in our remote offices across the United States.

Your membership will also come with great benefits, including our award-winning newsletter, The Deep Dish, which is full of relevant and timely reporting, access to our members’ Slack community, and online salons as a way to engage with reporters, food and agriculture experts, and each other.

Civil Eats Supporting Membership $60/year $6/month
Give One, Get One Membership $100/year
Learn more about our membership program

Lisa Held is Civil Eats’ senior staff reporter and contributing editor. Read more >

Like the story?
Join the conversation.

Leave a Comment

More from

Food Policy Tracker

Featured

Popular

House Ag Committee Continues Efforts to Block Animal Welfare Rules

An overhead view of a farm and farmland, with the Civil Eats Food Policy Tracker logo superimposed. (Photo credit: John Reed, Unsplash)

Op-ed: Through Acts of Solidarity, We Can Support Immigrants in the Food Chain and Beyond

Immigrant farmers, food workers, and vendors are a critical part of our food system. Here’s how to help them here in LA and nationwide (Photo credit: LA Food Policy Council).

What Bees Can Teach Us About Survival and Well-being

USDA Renews Effort to Collect SNAP User Data, Prompting Privacy and Immigration Concerns

A logo showing the Civil Eats Food Policy Tracker, looking like a radar following food policy proposals and actions