The post A Memoir of Communal Living Celebrates Families, Relationships, and Food appeared first on Civil Eats.
]]>In the first chapter of her book Group Living and Other Recipes, author Lola Milholland writes about coming home from elementary school to discover that her parents had given her bedroom to three Tibetan monks from India. They stayed for three months, and left behind a “sensory collage”—especially the scent of butter as they melted it into their tea, sizzled it with handmade wheat noodles, and shaped it into tiny ceremonial butter sculptures.
Then the monks were gone, replaced by a rotating cast of houseguests—relatives, family friends, more than 20 exchange students, and even a group of Indigenous Tairona from Colombia peddling free-trade coffee. Her parents, who lived mostly as roommates, welcomed them all, making “a life together—over days, weeks, months, years.” More guests stopped by for dinner. “There was always room at our table,” she writes.
Milholland, now the founder of Umi Organic, a groundbreaking noodle company in Portland, Oregon, and her brother, Zak, still live together and maintain similar communal living habits at their childhood home, a four-bedroom Craftsman on Holman Street in Portland. As their own unintentional community came together, including a few roommates and regular extended visits from friends and their mom, Milholland became compelled to write a book about her family’s unconventional approach to housing and their long and varied history of cohabitation.
The result is a warm intellectual journey through meals and relationships that invites readers to reconsider the norm of the romantically coupled household. The “recipe” for how to build a household or family can be a loose one, Milholland argues, emerging from lived experiences—just like the recipes that end each chapter, from familiar granola to cantaloupe-seed horchata.
“We got the opportunity to make noodles for schools in 2019, and that shifted my entire understanding of what the business was and could be.”
Milholland worked at the nonprofit Ecotrust for eight years on regional food and farming issues and was assistant editor of Edible Portland magazine before she started her noodle company in 2016. Umi ramen noodles, made from regionally grown and milled flour, were the first certified organic fresh ramen sold in American grocery stores and received a prestigious Good Food Award in 2021.
As we prepare to gather together during the holidays, Civil Eats spoke to Milholland about the lessons communal living can offer us all, the future of Umi Organic, and how stronger relationships and communities can benefit the broader food system, too.
Can you give a sense of the casual intimacies that develop in a communal living situation?
I’ve been thinking a lot about what really breeds intimacy. I don’t think it’s making a date with your friend once a month and having a beer with them for an hour. I think it’s spending time with people in space together. Experiencing each other. What’s the easiest way to be with each other and have that kind of easy contact? It’s having meals together.
Everyone is going to eat dinner. When you eat, you feel really alive. You’re taking care of yourself. You’re taking care of somebody else. You’re offering something of yourself. It may just feel like food, but it’s always more than that. It has to do with the culture that you come from, the places that you’ve been, your relationship to ingredients and the land. What makes you feel good? What kind of effect do you want to have in that moment? And you’re constantly all participating in that, and you’ve just learned so much about each other.
What are meals like at your house?
Most nights we cook and eat together, and special nights can stretch to as many as 10 people.
How do you divide cooking and after-dinner washing up?
I don’t have a problem asking people to help. I usually will just say, “Hey, will you help us peel garlic or wash lettuce?” When people do have a job, I think they get to feel more at home. And the opportunity to show someone how to do something they didn’t know how to do can be quite sweet.
Everybody cleans. Somebody’s unloading the dishwasher and putting the dishes away. Somebody is doing all the dishes. Somebody’s clearing and wiping down all the counters. Someone is putting any leftovers away and asking, “Who needs lunch tomorrow? Pack yourself a lunch.” Usually there’s three or four of us, so it’s quick, you get it done so fast.
How are food expenses shared?
“When people do have a job, I think they get to feel more at home. And the opportunity to show someone how to do something they didn’t know how to do can be quite sweet.”
We split bulk olive oil, bulk organic sunflower oil, bulk rice, and a CSA share. If we buy anything in a large volume, [we’ll split it]. I’m not a great gardener and I’ll buy a huge amount of tomatoes every year and we’ll can them and split the cost. In the past, we’ve even bought a quarter of a pig. Everything else we just buy for ourselves.
We pay for the meals we make, and if you have less money, you might make rice and lentils. And if you have more money, you might make a roast chicken. None of us are expecting anybody to spend some [particular] amount. So, there is an intrinsic sliding scale to it.
What are the dynamics of sharing household chores on a day-to-day basis?
We’re a household without a chore wheel. I think working without one is more egalitarian. We each take turns doing every role. I don’t mind doing certain things, and I really dislike doing others—that’s true for everyone in our household. I don’t mind cleaning the toilet or refrigerator. I’m not great at caring for house plants. It doesn’t mean it wouldn’t be cool for me to learn, but someone else is going to enjoy it, and it’s going to feel less like a job and more like a form of nurturing or care that they give to the house.
It’s not easy to ask someone to do something. You have to do it from a place of sincere desire, knowing that they can ask the same of you, whatever that is, and realizing the stakes feel kind of high.
Let’s come back to the cooking. A lot of the recipes in the book are Asian influenced. What other foods do you make?
Christopher’s [a roommate] influence has made Thai food sort of the beating heart of the household. I always make sure that we have things for a very simple Japanese meal and that makes me feel really grounded.
My brother loves to cook Mexican food. My mom used to make tortillas from scratch when I was growing up. We still have her big, beautiful wooden tortilla press that she carried back from Mexico on buses and hitchhiking in the ‘70s. She used to always make us fresh tortillas and cheese, and my brother’s become a really adept Mexican cook. My partner, Corey, loves Italian food. I love to cook Indian food because it feels so big and flavorful, and you really can eat just pulses [from the legume family] and vegetables.
How did your time in Japan shape your ideas about food?
I went to a public school with a Japanese immersion program, and I visited [Japan] many times before I lived there for a year in college. During that time, I lived with a family who was devoted to regional food. The mother was a professor of food studies and specialized in heirloom pickles. I gained such a sense of what a balanced meal was there. It was really influential.
How does Umi relate to these food experiences?
I don’t think Umi would ever exist if I hadn’t spent that year in Japan, not just because of my exposure to delicious noodles, but also my interest in regionalism. Ramen is really awesome because you go from one place to another in Japan, and each ramen is an expression of place, history, and personality.
I always felt like Umi is supposed to be an expression of place, in this case, the Pacific Northwest. So, we need to be using regional grains. We need to do something that feels connected with the farming community here. I never imagined this brand being national.
Umi’s yakisoba noodles have been served in more than two dozen school districts. How and why did you bring them to the local school food system?
Eventually, we got the opportunity to make noodles for schools in 2019, and that shifted my entire understanding of what the business was and could be. I had this commitment to the producers, to organic, to regionality, and it kept resulting in a product that was expensive. It had this really limited audience, and that didn’t feel right.
When we had an opportunity to make noodles for schools, it felt so much more meaningful and inspiring on a business level. It felt like an opportunity to enact the kind of food system that we want, to continue to hold our values and make it available more broadly. The only thing that made that possible is Oregon’s subsidies for local products for school meals. It’s a beautiful thing; we should make investments that benefit groups, including kids, farmers, food producers, families, local economies. Those things reverberate. It gave me a whole different lease on what the business was and could be.
A fire shut down your operation in June. Are you back in business?
The facility is still not operable, and in the meantime, we found another facility. We’re starting—me and another employee part-time—by just making noodles for schools and then step-by-step decide what we want to grow back into. We have to see if it works financially for us to continue to do this.
I’m calling it a year of experiments. I’m trying to see how I can serve food service, customers, restaurants, schools, corporate cafeterias, colleges. Of course national school lunch will be deeply impacted by the new administration [eventually], but this is a state program! The funding will not be impacted.
You’re in a house that questions tradition, but with the holidays coming, are there any food traditions you’ll be observing?
My mama’s mom always made doughnuts on Christmas morning. I’m not sure if that’s Polish. It’s probably some Polish with Americana combined. It is absolutely crucial to me that fresh, hot doughnuts be made, and these days, with sourdough. With [my grandma], it would have been yeast-raised.
On Christmas Day every year, I always make my grandmother’s doughnuts and invite family, friends, and Christmas stragglers over. We eat doughnuts and drink strong coffee while two of my friends prep their family’s tradition: a full falafel meal.
Because I’ve already got doughnut-frying oil going, it’s no big thing for [my friends] to step in and begin frying falafel. At some point we all sit down—whoever we may be —around our big dining room table covered in pita, hummus, tahini sauce, tzatziki, lettuce, and more, and eat together.
I love, love, love traditions—even if you’re interrogating [some of] them.
This interview was edited for length and clarity.
Makes 8-10 doughnuts plus doughnut holes
Lola Milholland uses her own sourdough starter for her family’s Christmas doughnuts, which allows for a long, flavor-developing rise. Lola’s grandma made a yeasted version. Depending on whether you choose sourdough or yeast, the timing will be a bit different for the first two steps. In either case, start the recipe early the day before serving.
This recipe can easily be doubled if you have lots of hungry people around your holiday breakfast table.
Ingredients
Sourdough sponge
Yeasted sponge
For the doughnuts
The day before serving, make the sponge:
For the sourdough version, combine the sponge ingredients in a large bowl in the morning and let rest at room temperature in a draft-free spot, covered, for 5-6 hours.
For the yeasted version, combine sponge ingredients in a large bowl in the afternoon and let rest at room temperature in a draft-free spot, covered, for 3 hours.
For both types, make the dough the evening before serving. Add 2½ cups all-purpose flour to the sponge and stir or lightly knead in the bowl until smooth.
The dough should be shiny and bouncy and not too tacky. If it seems like you should add more flour, let the dough rest first, then come back, knead some more, and observe; often it achieves a shiny and bouncy consistency just from having taken a break.
Form dough into a ball, set in an oiled bowl covered with a cloth or plastic wrap, and let rest overnight in the refrigerator.
The next day, turn the dough out onto a well-floured surface. Let rest about 15 minutes.
Roll out or pat the dough until it’s about ½ inch thick.
With a floured doughnut cutter or one large and one small biscuit cutter, cut out doughnuts and holes. Shake off excess flour. Place them on a baking sheet, covered with parchment. Let rest for an hour. They should puff up!
When ready to fry the donuts, heat 2 inches of the oil in a small cast iron pan to 350° F over medium-high heat. Oil is ready when simmering bubbles form around a wooden chopstick or wooden spoon handle inserted into the pan.
Fry one or two donuts and holes at a time, making sure not to crowd them. Turn them only once. Cook for 1 minute per side. Remove and drain on a paper bag.
Fill a small paper bag with ½ cup granulated sugar and a big pinch of fine salt. Add a hot donut to the bag, close it, and shake. Remove the coated donut and repeat with the rest. Serve hot.
The post A Memoir of Communal Living Celebrates Families, Relationships, and Food appeared first on Civil Eats.
]]>The post Rebecca May Johnson Explores Food, Feminism, and Self-Expression in ‘Small Fires’ appeared first on Civil Eats.
]]>Rebecca May Johnson’s new book, Small Fires: An Epic In The Kitchen, feels as radical as M.F.K. Fisher’s genre-defining work.
Before Fisher, American food writing was largely confined to home economists penning ad copy and columns for magazines. In the late 1930s, Fisher made food a literary project, setting a precedent for treating cooking and eating as significant subjects. The once revolutionary field grew constrained by publishing and media conventions that favor entertainment—as food writer Molly O’Neill wrote 20 years ago and Alicia Kennedy noted in her newsletter last week, arguing that the field has steered clear of encouraging sustainable eating choices. Johnson and Kennedy are part of a wave of authors stretching boundaries that emerged.
Small Fires reads like a bridge between the brain and the heart, putting caring for self and others on par with intellectual activities; every page is a critique of the hierarchies that divide these realms. Examining food, she carries us close to her thoughts, which are inherently feminist, covering philosophy, theory, poetry, psychology, and performance.
For instance, in a chapter titled “Unlovely Translations” she critiques the diminishing word lovely, a term that’s offered when she tells people she’s writing about cookery:
“When people ask about my work, an assumption hangs in the air that I am writing a lovely book of lovely recipes that will be beautifully photographed. That I will use joyful, sensual language about food and eating it in idyllic, softly lit settings. That I will be the performer of a perfectly feminine display—a Romantic-era ‘lovely maid’, perhaps, also erring towards the maternal. . . . Cookery writing is defined through women’s bodies, which are defined by a massive, crushing apparatus of myth and prejudice and norms.”
“Why am I not trying to think in the kitchen? Why am I treating it as a space separate to the library, when I’m doing so much of my thinking in the kitchen?”
We follow her as she learns to cook and experiments with styles of self-expression, in and out of the kitchen. We are drawn into her study of Niemands Frau, German poet Barbara Köhler’s response to The Odyssey; immersion in the classic text leads Johnson to wonder why literature commands such attention, yet everyday acts like cooking are unworthy of intellectual inquiry.
Johnson lives in the east of England and is an editor at Vittles, a London-based newsletter started by Jonathan Nunn during the pandemic. She, Nunn, and Sharanya Deepak, who is based in India, aspire to open up what they see as the narrow roads of food writing and cultivate new voices.
Civil Eats spoke to Johnson about the politics of her book, her hillside garden, and how food writing can liberate the voices of people from all walks of life.
Writers are told to write the book that you want to read. What was the formative itch here that you needed to scratch?
I didn’t have a model of what I wanted to write. Writing the proposal took three and a half years. I did want it to be a book that gave literary pleasure. The style and form of the writing was really important to me, influenced by people I cite in the book.
I wrote a book shaped by my experiences as a reader of literature, a researcher into literature at university, and a home cook, so the book reflects everything I’d been doing in the decade prior. It’s shaped by the different practices in which I’ve been engaged, including some experimental performances.
Can you name a book that informed Small Fires?
In 2016, I was just coming out of my Ph.D. and trying to figure out what I wanted to do next and really kind of despairing. I read Maggie Nelson’s book The Argonauts, and that was very exciting because I personally hadn’t read loads of nonfiction that brought philosophy into the everyday in such a playful way. She’s got [Ludwig] Wittgenstein and Roland Barthes within the first few pages and talks about her love life and the questions that preoccupy her about language and gender.
“People might need to invent a new way of writing to express what they want to say about food, and we should welcome that.”
I went to seek out more work like that and found Audre Lorde’s book Zami, which is amazing, and M.F.K. Fisher’s The Gastronomical Me, which is quite daring and writes about queer desire, eating oysters, and all sorts of things that are quite sensual. The poetry that I did my Ph.D. on, Kohler’s Niemands Frau, is a huge influence on the book stylistically. The title in German means nobody’s wife or nobody’s woman. I spent six years living with her work, and this is so much a book shaped by that work. Although it is not poetry, there’s places in the book where I play with poetic style and repetition.
Small Fires feels risky, new, and necessary. It’s exciting to see that the public and media are responding so well.
I honestly had no idea how the book was going to be received. I did a women’s studies masters [degree program], but my interests have always been in gender and feminism, so I’ve been thinking with other people for a long time. But in planning this book, I said, “Why am I not trying to think in the kitchen? Why am I treating it as a space separate to the library, when I’m doing so much of my thinking in the kitchen?”
Can you talk about the responsibilities of food writing to everyone in the food chain and to our interior worlds?
Writing about domestic space does not always have to be an actively uncritical service, like providing usable recipes and being pleasing all the time. Why not consider yourself a philosopher or an artist and prioritize the aesthetic and literary?
Literature has a world-building purpose; it creates a sense of what’s possible. There can be no limits on our ambitions about what food writing can be about because food relates to basically everything in life, from geopolitics to climate change, farming, labor rights, and all sorts of pleasure and imagination.
“I’m always thinking about labor when I write about food in public spaces. I’m trying to think about what hierarchies exist.”
I was reminded a few months ago by a colleague about the speculative function of writing. [In Small Fires,] I’m thinking about the recipe as a speculative text about something that has not yet happened, and he and I were talking about Yoko Ono’s book Grapefruit, which she self-published in the ‘60s and is full of texts that resemble recipes called “event scores.” Some scores give instructions for things that you can imagine, and others are actual recipes. That was an important reminder of the power of writing to suggest worlds, politics, or that which has not yet happened.
There’s space for literary pleasure and artistic experimentation in food writing, as there is in any other kind of literature, and through that we might liberate all sorts of voices. People might find a form that’s right for them that doesn’t already exist, especially through the normative pressures of publishing and how they privilege certain types of voices. People might need to invent a new way of writing to express what they want to say about food, and we should welcome that.
How does performance art figure into your life and book?
The chapter about tomato sauce began as a sort of lecture performance at a conference held at the Royal College of Art. My references for that were artists like Carolee Schneemann and her thinking about constraint and freedom. The recipe is a form of constraint, freedom, and voice. I began writing this list and realized I could keep writing it forever and ever, all the times I’d made this tomato sauce.
Other projects are in the background of the book. Jen Calleja, a brilliant translator and writer, invited me to do a translation of a short story into a recipe. The story has nothing to do with food, and she commissioned people to do these radical translations—into a tattoo, ceramics, and all these different media. I made an installation where I made the dish that I had designed from the short story and gave it to an audience and got them to make their own translations back into language from food.
The chapter about cooking sausages is an annotation of a kind of performance in which I style myself as D. W. Winnicott’s “patient” to test his theory that recipes restrict creativity. Cooking is knowledge that comes through the body and is of the body, and so having transcriptions of physical research felt important for keeping the body in the frame of the book. I wrote the second half of the book entirely by hand in another room in the house because I got tangled up and had forgotten the body.
“We want to make space for emerging voices. Often, people are writing about food for the first time, [outside] the ‘in’ crowd of food writers.”
What are the politics of the book?
There are different politics in my book, and one that comes fairly early is the labor politics of cooking and domestic space, and that it is work even if unpaid. My structural understanding of cooking as performance and social reproduction along Marxist lines is present in the book, and I’m always kind of witnessing it at work. Having a critical understanding of what’s going on in any space and avoiding the idealization of cooking and domestic space is important for me in the book.
I’m always thinking about labor when I write about food in public spaces. I’m trying to think about what hierarchies exist. Positioning capitalism in the domestic space is often not given adequate intellectual attention in the mainstream, in institutions such as universities, and certainly not in the U.K. There are more food studies [programs] in the U.S. But making the case for it having attention, critical thinking, and imagination lavished on it is a political intention of the book, an underlying goal.
But I’m not attempting to speak for everyone. I didn’t want to be making claims to speak from everyone’s position. We will need everyone to write their book about the environment, labor conditions, whatever they want to write. I hope as a writer I’m holding open the door.
Is that what’s happening at Vittles?
We want to make space for many points of view, experiences, and voices, especially those who are excluded from mainstream media outlets, in the U.K. in particular. We’re always asking, “Is this the best person to tell this story?” and looking to see if there’s a hierarchy within a piece, beyond the position of the writer.
We want to make space for emerging voices. Often, people are writing about food for the first time, [outside] the “in” crowd of food writers. We’re always thinking: what are the political structures, what are the economic structures in the focus of a piece? In the editing process, we try to work with writers to bring out their voice rather than impose our voice on them as a publication. We don’t want to erase the breadth of different voices, and we think about that very carefully in our editorial meetings.
At the moment, we’re doing a cooking from life column, inviting people who are not food writers to write about their domestic lives from a range of backgrounds and locations. There’re other parts to Vittles—a restaurant section and the hater column, kind of cultural critique that’s slightly provocative.
Would you like to tell readers about your garden?
My allotment is on the side of a hill, and it’s very windy, overlooking the river, so it gets the blast of wind off the water. Every year I see what will grow. I just had a massive artichoke glut. I grew these artichokes from seed, and they absolutely love the climate and gave about 30 artichokes per plant. I took some to a party recently and gave them out to anyone who could take them.
One of the loveliest things the last few years I’ve been growing is cicoria, a bitter Italian green. The slugs and snails are not interested in it, and neither are the butterflies. I love to eat it, and then it goes to seed or to flower in the most beautiful way. It turns out these huge spires with these pale electric blue flowers; it’s absolutely stunning and it’s perennial. I’ll cut it down to the ground when it’s finished flowering, put a bit of mulch around it, and it’ll come back next year.
What books are you excited about this fall?
There are two books I would recommend. First: Ordinary Notes by Christina Sharpe—a masterpiece of nonfiction about Black life and white supremacy that is formally experimental. The book works with memoir and historical sources to tell a personal and expansive story that is moving, deeply troubling, and sharpens the critical faculties. Second: Look at the Lights, My Love by Annie Ernaux, translated by Alison L. Strayer, which is a nonfiction book about Ernaux’s visits to the supermarket over a few months, which gets under the skin of contemporary capitalism and French society through close readings of everyday life.
This interview has been edited for length and clarity.
This story has been updated to correct where Johnson lives and the name of her translator friend.
The post Rebecca May Johnson Explores Food, Feminism, and Self-Expression in ‘Small Fires’ appeared first on Civil Eats.
]]>The post Sarah Vogel Fought the Government on Behalf of Family Farms appeared first on Civil Eats.
]]>Attorney Sarah Vogel made history when she raised and won the first class-action lawsuit against the federal government to protect North Dakota farmers from illegal foreclosures during the farm crisis of the 1980s. Coleman v. Block, also known as the case of the North Dakota Nine, stretched into a national class action lawsuit and led to critical legislation, the Agricultural Credit Act of 1987, which radically changed the way farm credit disputes were handled.
In the early 80s, farmers faced an economic crisis spurred by high interest rates and operating costs, low crop and land prices, and severe weather. Rather than providing assistance, the Reagan administration savaged a long-standing farm credit program, leaving farmers—who had voted Reagan into office—facing impossible demands leveled by suddenly hostile government creditors. Debts were accelerated, and farmers were asked to pay off entire loans decades in advance of their original timeline. To make matters worse, farmers could only register complaints about the unreasonable measures to the very agencies and people who created them.
A young lawyer and single mother facing foreclosures on her own home, Vogel took on the struggling farmers as clients, even though many could not afford to pay her. Her work drew the national spotlight, she appeared in a Life magazine photo essay and was depicted the 1984 movie Country starring Jessica Lange. Coleman v. Block, however, was not just stunning in its time. The win helped create a wave of agricultural justice efforts—often grassroots and peer-to-peer in nature—that continue to this day. Willie Nelson and Farm Aid are among the many fans of Sarah Vogel and her book.
Vogel’s memoir about this period, The Farmer’s Lawyer, published last November, is as much a recounting of this time as it is an agricultural thriller. It sets the stage by showing the history of the Nonpartisan League (NPL), a left-wing political party founded by Socialist Arthur C. Townley in North Dakota, and its protections of farmers in the Great Depression. Vogel’s grandfather was a prominent NPL member and served as president of the Bank of North Dakota from 1937-1944.
That legacy makes her progression seem fluid: of course this lawyer would carry forward the impulse to serve farmers and fight for them using legal circuits, becoming the first female head of a state department of agriculture, and more. Vogel’s past work with Native Americans also led to a recent appointment to the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Equity Commission, which is charged with eradicating discrimination from USDA programs.
The book is wonderfully written, and available in print or audio narrated by Vogel. Hearing this heavy-hitting tale in her steady, soft-spoken voice is a lesson in applying yourself and your values to work and life.
Civil Eats spoke to Vogel about the writing process, why mid-size family farms are critical for thriving rural communities, and how individuals and lawyers can play a significant role in changing agriculture.
What inspired you to write this book?
While I was doing the case, I knew it was really important. I often thought I should be writing a diary, but I didn’t have time. I did save all the papers that I filed, my phone messages, rough drafts of briefs, rough drafts of affidavits, and records of people’s lives. I put them in boxes, and they marinated for decades. While visiting a historian of the Nonpartisan League, I learned of archives on the ’80s farm crisis that were about to be destroyed, and I added them to my collection.
At first, it felt uncomfortable to write about myself, but working collaboratively [with book development expert Leigh Stein] was natural. I learned that in my legal training. We always had a critical eye on each other’s work and never filed anything without help.
What other research was involved?
Telling the story of what was happening to farmers when they hired me meant including the history of the Nonpartisan League. I read so much about that I swear I lived through the 1930s. The ’30s and the ’80s are inextricably intertwined.
In North Dakota in the ’30s, there was a precipitous land devaluement. The more land goes on the market, the more land values decrease. Governor [William] Langer’s foreclosure moratorium [in 1932] stopped the slide until FDR got into office. Another valuable thing was that the Bank of North Dakota rented land back to farmers when it was in the bank’s possession so that farmers could keep working the land.
I couldn’t include everything I uncovered. A lot of history got cut, and the book is better for it. But I’d like to tell it elsewhere.
Can you summarize the impact of the case?
Most immediately, the case addressed horrible conditions: the freezing and seizure of farmers’ bank accounts [and] the starvation of animals because farmers didn’t have operating credit, which they relied on to run their farms. Farmers were not allowed to access to the crop money and livestock income that they earned. They didn’t have a fair hearing officer, and they did not have a fair process. And my case changed that.
Congress adopted a big series of reforms, the Coleman reforms, which have been fine-tuned since passing the Agricultural Credit Act in 1987. They give farmers a fair hearing before a neutral hearing officer, and that, I think, is the biggest legacy today. It’s like night and day, compared to the way it used to be. And, well, the lasting effects are perhaps saving multi-generational farms that would have been lost in the ’80s, but weren’t because of the injunction. Maybe saving those farms also saved farmers’ lives.
What do you hope the book will achieve?
History says that there will be more farm crises. I did not want another farm crisis by neglect, or on purpose. In the case of the Reagan administration, it was intentional. They really did not want government supporting farmers. The hypocrisy of the whole approach was horrible because they campaigned on helping farmers. Then the minute they got in, they put the hammer to family farmers. The delinquency reduction quota was so harmful and unnecessary. It had cataclysmic results. And right up through the denouement of the whole ’80s farm crisis, Reagan was still saying, “Take away those protections.” That was in his signing statement. Do I sound angry? Well, I’m not over that yet. He was a disaster for farming.
But back to the big picture. I hope the book supports the long-held plank of American life and democracy that rural people and farmers—and food grown in the U.S.—are very important. I’m trying to nurture that feeling and let people know about what happened in the ’80s. It could happen again if we’re not careful.
I also want the book to help people understand the nature of farmers, their attachment to their land, and their importance to communities. Public awareness is what I’m writing for. There is a lot of irrefutable sociological, economic, and historical information that proves that the presence of middle-sized family farmers creates thriving rural communities. If you lose family farms, you will lose thriving rural communities. There’s so much talk now about red areas and struggling rural areas and why did communities that used to vote Democrat turn Republican? Why are these small towns dying, and what’s the program to revive the small town? The program would involve family farmers.
In the book, I wanted to show that the little guys can make a difference. For example, I included the story of how Tom Nichols inspired Lou Anne Kling, who was the goddess of the farm advocacy movement, to help other farmers to be advocates. His story shows that a single person can have a huge impact.
Another lesson I hope the book conveys is that if people start a challenging project that is very important to them, big things can come of it. One never knows whether others will come to help you or not. Getting a call from the national director of the [American Civil Liberties Union], right before I was ready to file the case—well, I mean, wow! If I had waited to do something until I had the national ACLU on board, it would not have happened. Sometimes you just have to walk off the diving board. Another job of the book is to show that law can be used as part of the remedy. That’s why I got a little cranky in the book about lawyer jokes.
I remember your description of the bevy of lawyer jokes at rodeos and how it upset you that lawyers were trashed, even as you knew how critical they were/are to farm survival.
Public interest lawyers, lawyers working for people—this kind of work is really important. It should be a tool that people think about, not just lobbying. Lawyers are a very important piece of the puzzle. Law schools have specialties in agriculture law, and the Yale Law School recently held an all-day seminar on agriculture and antitrust issues.
What farming challenges could be tackled through the legal system?
There’s a groundswell of deep interest in antitrust law. Democrats and Republicans have not paid attention to antitrust laws, and changes require staffing. Without funds from Congress, nothing can happen. I would tell people to put pressure on Congress to give serious money to these antitrust enforcement agencies, so that they can hire people, get the experts, and do the work. President Biden’s antitrust statement is incredible—fabulous, over-the-top good. It’s up to Congress now to give money—serious money—to the Department of Justice and USDA, because they have the enforcement powers of the Packers and Stockyards Act.
I don’t think big corporations that are the size of small countries are going to be too scared of the Department of Justice or USDA unless there is a big infusion of money. This is something that normal people can do, without getting a law degree; ee can have a voice and ask representatives to fund antitrust work.
What else can help farmers now?
There’s a lot of action, a lot of initiatives. I see a lot of great ideas coming from Indigenous and Black farmers. For 10 years, I was holed up in the basement writing the book, and when I emerged, I saw lots of changes.
I don’t consider myself to be that old, but I’ve watched the railroad spurs to small towns get rolled up. The little grain elevators that were all over the landscape are no longer there. The new economy will be different from the old economy. I hope the focus is how people can support middle-sized farms and how small farmers can grow to middle-sized—and that has nothing to do with acreage.
What worked nationally in the ’30s to get people out of trouble was production controls and fair pricing. I’m not an ag economist and haven’t followed the farm bill lately, but the USDA still collects parity figures, and that was one of the programs that worked so well. More generally, Congress has got to get over its dysfunction. The National Farmers Union and sustainable ag organizations need to work to make and implement a farm bill that is family-sized and farmer-centric, not geared toward exporters and suppliers. I see a great deal of good ideas percolating up from the countryside. We need another Country Life Commission or bold experimentation like FDR’s and put the concerns of farmers forward.
I’m optimistic now about the leadership at USDA. Secretary Vilsack has been making some amazing appointments—people who know the ground they’re covering. They’ve got three more years to put many of these reforms into place. I’m excited about that.
This interview has been edited for length and clarity.
The post Sarah Vogel Fought the Government on Behalf of Family Farms appeared first on Civil Eats.
]]>The post Op-ed: After the Pandemic Flour Craze, Micro-Millers Take Stock appeared first on Civil Eats.
]]>In March and April 2020, as the pandemic crippled our previously reliable food supply chains, many people discovered fresh flour from small, regional mills. I have evangelized about this kind of flour for years, but to have my personal passion take off in popularity because of a terrifying health crisis was far from ideal.
Now that the dust of the pandemic flour boom has begun to settle, I have been talking to small-scale millers to see how they endured. In the grand scheme of flour, these mills aren’t just small, they’re micro. The milling industry is concentrated like the rest of agriculture, and dominated by four companies that run mega-mills around the country. Wheat is grown far from population centers, harvested in bulk, and sold to grain elevators. Everything, including seed varieties, defaults to industrial standards for factory milling and baking.
By contrast, micro flour mills are working with farmers in their region; in some cases the mills are actually run by the farmers themselves. This is a hard part of the food system to quantify: The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) isn’t tracking how many small-scale mills there are or tabulating how many acres of grains are harvested for this kind of processing. There is no craft flour guild, as there is for small-scale malting, to support or speak for this neighborhood of local and regional food systems.
I decided to survey local and regional mills around the country to take stock of the state of micro-local milling. How did these businesses weather the early days of the pandemic? Has the increased demand kept up or did those panic-buyers go back to mass-produced flour or stop baking altogether? Below, some of the successes—and challenges—of meeting the pandemic flour boom.
Carolina Ground
Established: 2012
Asheville, North Carolina
Pandemic boom: 100 percent increase in retail sales, 150 percent increase in milling rates
Carolina Ground was born of another global food crisis, the one caused by commodity grain speculations in 2007 and 2008. Facing impossible prices for flour, a group of bakers in western North Carolina got together to try to secure a local supply. These beginnings undergird Carolina Ground’s business model of serving wholesale bakers.
“We sell our wholesale flour to our bakery customers at a lower price so [they] can make bread that’s affordable,” said miller Jennifer Lapidus. Retail flour sells at a premium to subsidize Carolina Ground’s wholesale business, and by focusing on larger volumes they can drive growth back to farms.
Last year, the mill closed for two weeks to figure out how to keep staff safe. Retail sales doubled when they reopened. A few months later, those sales stabilized to a new normal that was significantly higher than before the pandemic. The boost gave Lapidus confidence about the mill’s stable future: Instead of renewing a rental lease in 2020, she bought an 8,000 square-foot building outside Asheville.
Cairnsprings Mill
Established: 2016
Burlington, Washington
Pandemic boom: 500 percent increase in retail sales
“We lost 25 percent of our business when restaurants closed. Opening up to the public saved us,” said co-founder Kevin Morse. The mill is open every Saturday and sells 3,000 to 4,000 pounds of flour each week, but during the early days of the pandemic they were selling 18,000 pounds per week. People now make weekly circuits through the Skagit Valley, where the mill is located, to buy flour, beer, bread, and meat. The consumer response to fresh flour is strong, and this year, Cairnsprings also started an online store and retail distribution to grocery stores.
“Food should be seen as economic development. The need for infrastructure to facilitate food development is key,” said Morse, who worked in rural economic development and at the Nature Conservancy before starting the mill in 2016. The pandemic sent shockwaves through the system—with some positive repercussions for rebuilding middle infrastructure like mills—yet Cairnsprings still struggles with access to business basics, like financing that would help them put in grain silos and another milling line. But, Morse said, “the demand is there.”
Barton Springs Mill
Established: 2016
Dripping Springs, Texas
Pandemic boom: 3,500 percent increase in retail sales
“Overall, we mill about 12,000 pounds of flour a week, but at the height of it, we were milling 30,000 pounds a week. Between March and April, we went from filling 8 orders a day to 300 orders a day, and stayed at 120 until a few months ago,” said owner James Brown. (This central Texas mill just west of Austin closed for a full week because of the Big Freeze in February, but did not suffer damages.)
Barton Springs stores all 400 tons of its yearly grain needs on-site, so they had plenty of supply to meet the demand. They had plenty of packaging, too. Labor and logistics were trickiest to work out, but Brown hired chefs and sous chefs who were suddenly in limbo to help manage the flow. “It was pretty uncomfortable adjusting, switching from bagging 50-pound bags to 2.5- and 5-pound bags.”
National flour struggles, he said, made a lot more people aware of the grain economy, whether they retain them as customers or not. Right now, their online sales are still higher than pre-pandemic, but only by about 10 percent. In May, when writing contracts for the next growing season, he decided he couldn’t take any more of a risk, and did not increase the acreage he contracted with farmers. One thing that’s changed, however, is Brown has realized the importance of education. “I know I have to keep our customers returning,” he said. To do that, the he has made a commitment to telling more of the story of their flour on social media and other remote educational channels, and he looks forward to the reopening the education facility at the mill.
Grist & Toll
Established: 2014
Pasadena, California
Pandemic boom: 200–400 percent increase in retail sales
“I woke up one morning and our web orders were coming in at one a minute. It was sheer panic,” said owner Nan Kohler. To manage the situation, she shut the website down and began limiting the amount of flour people could buy.
Not wanting to create a backlog, each week she calculated how much grain she had and how long it would take to make each type of flour. Yet when she updated the store, the website would inevitably crash because people were so eager for flour. The pressure was intense, and it strengthened her conviction that the system for producing staple foods in the U.S. needs to change. In particular, Kohler said, California needs 4 to 6 regional grain handling facilities to clean, store, and transfer grain because farmers are not able to get crops to the few existing mills. Right now, the nearest cleaning facility is 5 hours away from the Pasadena mill. And where, she asks, is the money going to come from to rebuild this kind of infrastructure?
“Food security needs to become much more compelling to venture capitalists,” said Kohler. This will happen as consumers understand they can create change by choosing good food, she hopes.
Groundup Grain
Established: 2019
Hadley, Massachusetts
Pandemic boom: 1,000 percent increase in milling volume
“We had just about everything we needed, a good grain supply and a flour mill,” co-owner Andrea Stanley said of meeting the demand last spring. As the supply chain disruption began, she saw the need for more flour, and contracted with Domoy Farms in western New York for an extra 40 acres of spring wheat. All of this was possible because Groundup is the logical extension of Valley Malt, Andrea and Christian Stanley’s parallel grain business and pioneering New England malthouse.
Malt business dropped off when breweries and brewpubs were affected by closures, and the mill filled a gap. As their sales demand grew from 1,000 pounds per week to 10,000, they worked 12 to 14 hours a day, 6 to 7 days a week, through June, a pace that convinced them to order another mill from New American Stone Mills.
When Groundup Grain opened in July 2019, they sold strictly wholesale flour because as maltsters, that’s what they knew. Switching from institutional sales to retail bagging early in the pandemic was a bumpy process, but they figured it out. Other challenges included setting up online ordering, learning how to get reasonable shipping rates, and trying to physically keep up with running the mill. Prior to COVID, the Stanleys had only long-term plans for retail, but the retail shift has brought home bakers on board, as a really fun addition: Andrea Stanley observed that, similar to the way people are into craft beer, people can get really into fresh flour, and a crowd of excited amateur experts can have a long impact on regional grain economies.
Janie’s Mill
Established: 2017
Ashkum, Illinois
Pandemic boom: 4,000 percent in sales
“The mental aspect of what we did,” said farmer and owner Harold Wilken, was really satisfying. “We had letters, emails, text messages, thanking us for flour when they couldn’t find it anywhere else.”
Janie’s Mill has a very short supply chain—they own their mill, grow the grain on their farm, and run a cleaning facility—enabling them to quickly adapt to the spike. Finding 30 extra people to run two shifts was simple because college and high school students were home. Ross Wilken, Harold’s son, usually sticks to farming but took on a night shift to meet the demand. Once things slowed down slightly, the mill was able to offer some of their milling capacity to other farmers, like Granor Farm in Michigan.
Since Janie’s Mill sells all its own retail flour through an online portal, they received valuable feedback from customers. They learned that those customers really wanted rye, so Janie’s increased their rye acreage accordingly. The growth has allowed the mill to work with other farmers, too, to get access to heritage corn varieties and grains that grow better elsewhere, like Kamut and durum. The mill is still very busy, and they created a Facebook group as a way to build community and answer questions; close to 800 people have joined already, exploring the mill’s many kinds of flour.
Maine Grains
Established: 2012
Skowhegan, Maine
Pandemic boom: 4,000 percent increase in online retail sales
“We’re trying to pretend that March and April never happened. A spike like that may never repeat,” said co-founder and president Amber Lambke. Yet COVID also legitimized mills like hers in the eyes of mainstream retailers. “We got calls from mainstream grocery stores we’ve been trying to get into for years,” she added.
Prior to the pandemic, the mill, located in a small town an hour and a half north of Portland, was averaging 24 online orders a week. At last year’s peak, they had 180 orders each day. The pinch point was milling time and bagging, so they bought two extra bagging and weighing machines. High school kids provided the extra hands.
The mill’s income didn’t skyrocket because the costs went way up. Before March, 82 percent of the mill’s business was selling bulk flour; this quickly dropped to 50 percent, and has only recently begun to return. Despite the challenges, Lambke said the mill feels even more secure after this experience. She had to reach out to more farmers than usual to meet their needs, and that makes her feels optimistic that eventually Maine Grains will become a conduit for non-commodity grain growing in the state.
Hayden Flour Mill
Established: 2011
Queen Creek, Arizona
Pandemic boom: 400 percent sales increase
“We had to turn off the tap at one point because we just couldn’t serve all the orders,” said Emma Zimmerman, who runs the Arizona-based heritage grain mill. “We turned 10 this year, and if this happened eight years ago, we could not have managed it.” They wouldn’t have had access to grains, or been able to ramp up capacity because they were still learning the ropes. Last year, however, they had the skills and supplies to pivot to retail.
Locals discovered them, surprised to find there was a mill in their backyard. At the end of the year, they invested the extra earnings by adding packaging equipment and augurs—and gave staff a good holiday bonus.
“It would have been nice to be able to [buy] a little more grain, but you can’t model on a big blip like that,” said Zimmerman. The impulse to be cautious was already in place, especially because even before the pandemic, the larger grain industry had noticed and begun responding to consumer interest in heritage grains.
So, what’s the takeaway? The boom didn’t last for most mills, but many millers feel more stable, and have been able make crucial investments. One of the companies that served this movement, New American Stone Mills, got so busy that they moved to a larger facility, where they are building six to eight mills on any given day, rather than the pre-pandemic level of two or three. But 2020 didn’t ultimately change the big picture of flour in the U.S. very much. Every day, 160 million pounds of flour is milled in the conventional industry. And it’s not clear how much change small mills can make without larger systemic investments and policy change.
Not that we needed a crisis to show us that regional agriculture needs processing infrastructure; studies like Vermont’s Farm to Plate local-foodshed initiative made that clear a decade ago. My hope is that small flour mills’ ability to step up and answer needs of consumers early in the pandemic has helped private investors understand the importance of regional infrastructure for grain.
“Without aggregating and processing infrastructure, there really is no way for farmers to step into the (grains) market. Investment in that area is key,” said Heather Darby, head of the University of Vermont’s Crops and Soils Team, a key player in supporting the redeveloping grainshed in the Northeast.
Investment doesn’t have to be dream capital sailing in on a cloud. Changing lending habits and farm policies would help regional grain systems a lot. For instance, the USDA offers very low interest loans for silos to farmers, but mills are not eligible unless they grow the crops they want to store. Farmers don’t always have the opportunity to ensure food-grade or malt grains; crop insurance is set by the patterns of what is already grown in a region. Novelty is not rewarded with protection against crop failures.
Did I expect the surge in sales last spring to recreate grain networks that have been disappearing since the 1870s? Maybe I did, hoping against hope that the food sector I adore is growing so slowly. Magical thinking makes me wish that consumer exposure to fresh flour changed things—but two months of desperately voting with one’s fork can’t reverse 150 years of consolidation in the food system.
It’s going to take generations to rebuild regional grainsheds, as miller Greg Russo from Farmer Ground Flour in Trumansburg, New York, reminded me. “The market is still forming itself. Bakers are still figuring it out. Farmers and millers are figuring out what quality criteria we can use, what we need,” he said. “It’s not so easy to scale this up.”
It’s certainly not easy, but I believe it’s worth the work.
The post Op-ed: After the Pandemic Flour Craze, Micro-Millers Take Stock appeared first on Civil Eats.
]]>The post Flour Shortage? Amber Waves of Regional Grains to the Rescue appeared first on Civil Eats.
]]>Outside the taut supply chains of industrialized food, small flour mills are working double-time to fill fresh flour orders for dedicated fans and a new crowd of bakers. And while these local millers have been around for generations, it took a pandemic to reveal them as alternatives to the dominant grain system. Today, having a relationship with nearby grain farmers seems like a more secure route to bread than it was just a month ago
Industrial milling and factory baking set the standards for what gets grown, and the global marketplace sets the price. Farmers are servants to massive debts they’ve had to take on to purchase equipment, and each year they borrow more money just to pay for inputs, labor, and other expenses.
The Trump administration’s trade wars tanked commodity prices, but agricultural economics have been fragile for decades. The price for a bushel of wheat in November 1980 was $5.34. Right now, it is $5.40 a bushel—and falling steadily.
Outside of this industrial baking complex, there exists a world of farmer-cultivated grain systems that not only address the limited choices farmers face inside the conventional system, but also produce delicious, fresh flour, which is generally stoneground and full of the fat and flavor that industrial processing strips away. And it is as different from its supermarket cousin as a tree-ripened peach is from a can of cling peaches.
From my first bite 10 years ago, the flavor of whole-grain, stoneground flour was so vibrant that I was compelled to investigate. I learned about Farmer Ground Flour, a mill started by two farmers in Ithaca, New York, who wanted a place to sell their crops. I visited Maine Grains, a mill built in a former jail, started by a group of neighbors who wanted to create opportunities for farmers to rebuild the Maine breadbasket. I wrote a book about these projects, and am a cheerleader for the regional grain movement, as evidenced by the 75 pounds of flour I just got in the mail. (This is a normal amount for me, not apoca-shopping.)
Photo courtesy of Carolina Ground in Asheville, North Carolina.
People who are just awakening to the promise of regional grains will be surprised to see just how many exist, how well-rooted they are—and how they’re ready to supply you with grains that will change your life.
Amber Waves of Regional Grain
There are many community grains, produced, processed, and distributed within local and regional value chains that remain intact despite the pandemic. Community Grains is the brand name of a Northern California grain system, and the informal term adopted by other grain pioneers, including legendary Montana farmer Bob Quinn and beginning farmers Halee and John Wepking.
By adapting food systems to a regional scale, farmer-leaders like Bob, Halee, and John are taking risks to better support and care for the land they steward from the ground to the bank. They’re giving consumers an opportunity to buy staple crops that invest in soil health, water quality, and carbon sequestration while offering skilled jobs that employ local folks—on the farm, at the mill, and in craft bakeries.
The WSU Bread Lab breeds wheat for taste and place, not the demands of the industrial food system. Director Stephen Jones speaks of growing grains outside of the grain belts, and of keeping farm products and dollars circulating within a region. Globally, groups are working to rebuild grain farms and grain-based enterprises rooted right where they are. One of these groups, the Colorado Grain Chain, describes it as “community, not commodity.”
A few projects in the major wheat-growing region of eastern Washington illustrate these two faces of grains. Most of the state’s crops are sold at harvest and often head for the Asian noodle market, but direct-marketing alternatives also exist. One of these, The Grain Shed in Spokane, is a bakery, mill, and brewery that started with a single farm. A few larger farms are selling some of their production in the standard fashion, but have built cleaning and storage facilities to sell some grain directly to customers, ton by ton.
The pandemic is creating opportunities to strengthen emerging local supply chains, in grains and every other food sector.
That may sound like a lot, but in the grain business it’s a drop in the bucket. And although providing (relatively) small amounts of barley and wheat to brewers and bakers in Seattle and Portland may be a pricey trickle of their output, these farmers find it worth the trouble—and a way to avoid at least some of the punishments of the uncontrollable markets and invisible consumers the commodities market has created.
The Rise of Regional Mills, Everywhere
More mills are answering such insecurity. Existing companies like Meadows Mills, Osttiroler Getreidemühlen, and Jansen Grist Mills are already serving community-scale grain systems, and so are two new ones. The Danish company Quartzmill has a handful of mills built or already in the works in America and Europe. New American Stone Mills, a Vermont company that started in 2015, already has 77 mills in North America, Australia, and Europe, as well as eight more underway. Right now, they’re getting daily inquiries as bakers watch the existing supply chain falter.
The pandemic is creating many similar opportunities to make changes that will strengthen emerging local supply chains, in grains and every other food sector, too. Empty supermarket shelves have meant less surplus bread, and food pantries have been out of this basic food for weeks. In response to this crisis, as we’re seeing in every corner of the food system, bakers’ groups are stepping up.
For instance, the Artisan Grain Collaborative (AGC) recently launched a bread donation project Neighbor Loaves, which gives eaters the chance to purchase extra loaves of bread for food pantries. The bread is baked with flour from neighbor farms and mills, and fills in some of the holes in the currently gutted food system.
Milling wheat at Ibis Bakery in Kansas City. (Photo credit: Ryan James Carr)
The bakeries offering Neighbor Loaves are charging full retail price for the donation bread. This ensures that these businesses will be able to pay rent, staff, and most critically, be able to afford the more-expensive flour from local mills, which supports nearby farms. The program is two weeks old and has already resulted in production of more than 3500 loaves, establishing temporary security for all layers of the local grain supply chain. AGC is working on launching a local tortilla donation program, too, and groups in the Northeast, Northwest, and Mid-Atlantic are starting their own Neighbor Loaves platforms
You can help, too: Join the fresh flour revolution! Order a bag of flour from a small mill or milling bakery, and make some pancakes with your family. (I keep a running list of mills on my website, and Grinder Finder offers another, international list.) Ask your local bakery if they want to start a Neighbor Loaves program. Buying from, and getting your local baker to support, regional mills and farms will keep these essential businesses going strong—and will drive home the fact that flour, just like other fresh foods, can come from nearby.
Top photo: Sparrow Bush Farm’s Neighbor Loaf. (Photo courtesy of Sparrow Bush Farm)
The post Flour Shortage? Amber Waves of Regional Grains to the Rescue appeared first on Civil Eats.
]]>The post Can Restaurants Survive the Pandemic By Feeding Those in Need? appeared first on Civil Eats.
]]>“I saw all our scheduled parties disappear and, at the same time, this need for food in the community blossoming,” Mullen said. Her immediate instinct was to call Second Harvest Heartland, the local food bank she often sent leftover food after large events. Chowgirls had also worked with Second Harvest and Hennepin County to address food-handling rules that could help the company salvage otherwise-wasted food. Changing these rules helped Chowgirls rescue 1,200 pounds of food when Minneapolis hosted the Super Bowl in 2018.
Through that process, Mullen gained an understanding of how restaurants and catering operations are perfectly situated to feed people, quickly and at scale. And during this unprecedented crisis, she’s begun putting that knowledge to work.
In mid-March, Chowgirls teamed up with local restaurants and food-assistance programs to create Minnesota Central Kitchen (MCK), a community-focused effort that is quickly ramping up to serve 10,000 meals a week. Modeled after Chef José Andrés’ World Central Kitchen, MCK is using rescued food from now-shuttered restaurants to cook hot meals delivered to 35 distribution sites in the Twin Cities area.
Andrés, who was featured on TIME magazine’s cover late last month, has been leading the charge in feeding communities in crisis worldwide, and converted five of his D.C.-area restaurants, and his outlet in New York City, into what he calls community kitchens. “Today an army of American cooks stands ready to serve our most vulnerable citizens, at a time when those cooks are themselves in desperate need of support,” Andrés wrote in a recent op-ed for the New York Times.
As states take dramatic action to slow the spread of the novel coronavirus, and the hospitality industry—which employed more than 12 million people pre-pandemic—tries to find a path toward survival, Mullen hopes that projects like hers and Andrés’s will set useful examples for the ways the system changes can adapt in the wake of the pandemic—and in the long run.
“There is a huge, immediate need for people who couldn’t stockpile at the grocery store,” Mullen said. But, she added, even if they scale up their own production, and inspire other groups to follow suit, “this is a long-term issue that we as a community will have to figure out.”
While many restaurants have closed, some owners have shifted gears to take-out models, and others are operating like grocery stores. Many restaurants are delivering food directly to hospital workers on the frontlines, some are being funded by wealthy tech donors to help feed the needy in the Bay Area, and some have been feeding laid-off restaurant workers, like Mozza Pizzeria in Los Angeles, which was helping address non-food needs such as unemployment claims, until Chef Nancy Silverton herself was diagnosed with coronavirus.
Chef Rick Bayless in Chicago announced on Twitter that he received a $250,000 donation to hire 15 of his laid-off restaurant workers to sort grocery boxes, distribute groceries to employees at his restaurants, and partner with Chicago chefs to pick up groceries for their staff.
Some, like MCK, are using their skills to keep feeding people during the crisis. As community food needs and stay-at-home orders expand, restaurants are moving quickly to reconfigure their work. And for many chefs, in order to continue supporting restaurants’ shift to provide nutritional and economic support for their communities, policymakers are going to have to step up their support, or at least stay out of the way.
“The opportunity now is for the government to affordably contract with restaurants, procure local food, and make sure citizens get healthy food,” said Robert Egger, the founder of DC Central Kitchen and LA Central Kitchen. Egger and other advocates are calling on governors and municipalities to link small and sustainable farmers who once sold what they produced mainly to restaurants and the swelling population of economically vulnerable people.
“Congress and the administration took a good first step for small business relief in the CARES Act, and when Congress comes back we’ll all be looking for additional loans, tax relief and potentially, access to even more cash grants,” said Katherine Miller of the James Beard Foundation, which helped create the Independent Restaurant Coalition, an advocacy group voicing the necessity of these measures.
Policy solutions are likely to be slow in coming, but restaurants, entrepreneurs, and organizers are creating their own rapid-response solutions. WCK, along with Feeding America, last week announced the launch of America’s Food Fund on GoFundMe to address the nation’s food access crisis, with $12 million in funding from Leonardo DiCaprio, Laurene Powell Jobs, Apple, and the Ford Foundation. And others are already building bridges between restaurants and emergency feeding programs. MCK relies on Second Harvest to raise funds for operational expenses and soup kitchen Loaves & Fishes for its distribution expertise.
In Boston, Forge Baking Company is making meals for Community Cooks, an organization that usually runs on volunteers. Forge is able to absorb the cost of labor and food through their GoFundMe campaign, which has raised more than $25,000.
In Westchester County, just outside New York City, chefs partnered with the Feeding Westchester food bank to launch a Million Gallons project to make soup for the suddenly unemployed hospitality sector. They are also crowdfunding support and have challenged other chefs to join the effort.
Nationwide food bank network Feeding America’s MealConnect digital logistics program helped match perishable food and staples from recently closed restaurants to food shelves and meal programs. Ad hoc collaborations are in place, too, as chefs band together to make sure food doesn’t go to waste, whether that involves renting moving trucks to create mobile markets, or funneling food from closed restaurants to ones that are staying open.
That’s what happened with Hope Breakfast Bar in St. Paul, Minnesota. Chef Brian Ingram has cooked in food trucks, popups, bars, and even during disasters: Ingram set up a barbecue and fed aid workers in New York City for a couple of days after Hurricane Sandy. When the coronavirus shutdown started, there was no question in his mind what they’d do.
“We decided to pivot to become a community restaurant. We never even thought of doing curbside service,” Ingram said. Even though this situation will last much longer than the hurricane response, Ingram and his wife, Sarah, are prepared to keep giving away food until they can’t anymore.
Hope Breakfast has 20 people on staff, and for the moment, employees are still getting paid. One couple is minimizing contact with others by cleaning overnight. Other restaurants that closed donated food, and people are donating food and money. One food supplier switched the restaurant’s account to a nonprofit category and began funneling them food to help keep the project rolling.
In Seattle, Filipinx restaurant Musang felt the impact of the pandemic earlier than most. After shutting down operations in mid-March, chef-owner Melissa Miranda switched to take-out for one day only, but immediately realized it didn’t suit her community-driven vision. Musang began as a popup four years ago, a project to educate people about Filipino food. Giving space and attention to Filipino culture, and connecting to social justice efforts such as FareStart, YouthCare and FEEST Seattle has always been a key part of the work. Using the restaurant’s resources to help others addresses some of the fear and insecurity that belong to this moment felt right.
Musang is one of several restaurants that make up the Seattle Community Kitchen Collective, which is preparing free meals and using social media and word of mouth to make sure people know they are available daily in the city’s South End.
At Musang, Miranda and several of her staff are making about 150 meals a day. They send the food to the nearby Filipino Community Center, and provide free meals and groceries to anyone who calls. (They schedule individual pickups 15 minutes apart to keep proper spacing.)
Food donations are keeping the process rolling, and Miranda is looking ahead to regular business resuming, when she hopes to offer a community day every week at a revived Musang. For now, however, Miranda encourages people to work within their own communities to help those in the most need. For her, that means feeding people, setting up a relief fund to help former Musang staff, and organizing with other restaurants to demand more than loans from the government.
“It’s hard not to be angry. It’s hard not to be sad. We’re only doing what we can,” said Miranda. “How can we make change now for the future?”
The post Can Restaurants Survive the Pandemic By Feeding Those in Need? appeared first on Civil Eats.
]]>The post The Women Reviving Heirloom Grains and Flour appeared first on Civil Eats.
]]>While the reporting included baker Roxana Jullapat and flour miller Nan Kohler, it reflected the media’s habit of treating men in the industry like rock stars and overlooking women doing similar work. This lopsided approach to story telling has become standard as artisan baking has grown hip and regional grain systems have developed over the last decade. But there are plenty of women at the forefront of the movement re-imagining grains, flour, and bread.
Just one week after the Times article ran, a group of women gathered for a panel discussion in L.A. that had been planned for months, but also functioned as a kind of response to the story. “Bread Winners: A Conversation with Women in Bread” was organized by the California Grain Campaign to salute the work of women during Women’s History Month.
“Zoe Nathan has been baking bread for years [at Huckleberry Bakery and Café and Rustic Canyon], but when people talk about [artisan] bread, they act like it started three years ago at Clark Street Bread,” said Jullapat, co-owner of Friends And Family, the bakery and restaurant that hosted the talk.
And the event had bigger fish to fry than gender parity. The talk was just one of several in the California Grain Campaign, a grassroots push to get more bakers using 20 percent whole-grain, California-grown and -milled flours by 2020. At farmers’ markets and bakeries, the campaign creates opportunities for fresh flour to speak for itself, and for bakers and other grain advocates to explain what’s going on with this “new” ingredient.
The California Grain Campaign catalogue with Mai Nguyen’s grains in bread. (Photo by Jessica Blackstock)
Heritage whole-grain flours have very different flavor profiles than off-the-shelf flours, and while they have been creating a buzz in the baking community for years, the campaign’s advocates also hope to help consumers understand why they’re worth the added cost at $2 to $4 a pound.
The first Bread Winners event was intended to be an extension of the conversation Jullapat often found herself having with Kohler when picking up heritage grain flour at Kohler’s mill, Grist & Toll; the two women wanted to tap into that creative exchange and foster a broader dialogue about baking and fresh flour.
Soon they invited other speakers to join them, including grain farmer and California Grain Campaign organizer Mai Nguyen and baker Kate Pepper. The topic hit a chord, and 100 free tickets were snapped up in days. On the day of the event, many people were turned away at the door.
Nguyen, who grows heritage wheat in California (and was featured in a video series from King Arthur Flour and the National Young Farmers Coalition on the next generation of grain farmers), framed the talk with a poetic evocation of seeds and grains.
“We know from the historical record that women saved seeds,” said Nguyen. In the case of women entering and escaping slavery, persecution, or oppression, she added, “women carried seeds for futures they might not even [be part of].”
Many in the crowd were excited about the alternative grains, flours, and baked goods at the center of the panelists’ work. “The word that kept coming up was ‘inspiration.’ Our community is really hungry for that engagement about grains,” Kohler said after the event.
At the Bread Winners event (Photo credit: Ashley Payne)
Participants asked questions like: Where do we buy it? How do we use it? What makes it different—and so expensive?
The audience wanted to understand what it takes to generate flavorful fresh flour, and how heritage wheat travels from the farm to their croissants.
Nguyen told the story of two California women who were not in the room, Sally Fox and Monica Spiller. Key protagonists in the emerging regional grain revival, Fox is a cotton breeder, and Spiller is a chemist with a strong interest in grains. The women have worked in tandem on multiple seed projects at Fox’s farm, with Spiller growing out teaspoons-full of heritage varieties from the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Small Grains Collection in Idaho.
This initiative helped get white Sonora wheat included in Slow Food’s Ark of Taste. Native Seeds/SEARCH also included Sonora wheat in their seed conservation work in Arizona, and Spiller has shepherded it and other grains from sample size to volumes farmers could plant. Sonora wheat is now a relatively familiar food because of the way these women worked behind the scenes. Because Spiller’s name is still unknown, Nguyen wants to change that.
At the Bread Winners talk, Nguyen invited the crowd to write thank you notes to Spiller for her work and vision—and the audience did just that.
“I’m very grateful that they noticed my work,” Spiller said in a phone interview after the event. She’s the founder of the Whole Grain Connection and while the organization is dedicated to understanding and supporting landrace grains, whole-grain baking and nutrition are where her heart is.
Spiller’s curiosity was piqued when she learned about the superior nutrition of whole grains in the 1970s. “Why on earth do we not eat our grain foods whole?” she wondered at the time. Spiller trained as a chemist, and then worked first in teaching and then in pharmaceuticals. This background applied well to her investigations of whole-grain sourdough baking.
She wanted to know what bread was like before the 1880s, when refined flour became widely available, so she studied sourdough. Her interest in old-fashioned wheat varieties began in the early 1990s, as she began to consider how contemporary wheats reflect the needs of industrial milling and factory baking, not the stone-ground flour she saw as superior. Her fascination with grains eventually became her study and profession.
“I wanted to grow the [wheat] varieties I had read about in history books, and I realized that the USDA Small Grains Collection would give you samples,” said Spiller. She grew out Sonora, Pacific Bluestem, Baart, Foisy, and other varieties. Collecting her annual selections from the plants that did well, she noticed that these varieties grew taller than modern wheats, and would shade out the weeds, making them perfect for organic farming.
In baking with early landrace varieties, she also found culinary traits worth pursuing. She started the Whole Grain Connection in 2000 with a view toward promoting a small selection of varieties and providing farmers with seeds.
“Sonora was so attractive because we know its history. It might have been the first wheat introduced on this continent, and it was very successful in the southwestern region of North America,” she said.
There are no native wheats in the Americas—corn is this land’s native grain. Many groups of immigrants brought their own varieties, and the ones that survived did so because they thrived where people settled. Sonora, a Mediterranean type of wheat, grows well in Mediterranean climates. Heartier Russian wheats were planted in the Midwest. The Amish brought spelt to Ohio.
These grains began to disappear as production and milling centralized, and plant breeders targeted traits that were best for refined flour. America let go of the grains that had been our amber waves, and 125 years of white flour—farming, milling, baking and eating—won’t go away overnight.
The multiple dialogues that began at Bread Winners are continuing. People see the need to speak up for these new old-fashioned flours, and for women who are championing these grains.
Miller Nan Kohler already works hard on the education aspect, creating online and instore materials that detail how her flours perform. The Bread Winners talk also demonstrated the need to host more classes at her mill in Pasadena. The bread classes she runs sell out immediately, and she knows she has to help people get to know her product.
“I want to change people’s baking repertoires, and that takes a lot of dialogue because each grain and each grind is unique,” said Kohler. She wishfully joked about having a weekly wheat radio program dedicated to answering questions about alternative grains and flours.
Baker Roxana Jullapat left the event in Los Angeles fired up to create a professional network to share baker-to-baker questions, and get recipes out to help people bake with heritage flours in their homes. Now is not the time to be proprietary about recipes, she said.
The bakers and farmers all agree on the importance of supporting women-owned grain and bread businesses. Leyna Lightman, also from the California Grain Campaign, started a Google doc with names in the L.A. area after the event.
Of course, finding women-run bread businesses isn’t easy. Many appear at farmers’ markets or as subscription-based community supported bakeries (CSBs). This is because the same dynamics that restrict women from advancing in other entrepreneurial spaces are at work in baking. Panelists Kate Pepper of Kate’s Bread, Christine Nelson of Demeter Bread & Pastry, and Crystal White of Wayfarer Bread have all turned to alternative venues like these when they couldn’t find the funding to establish a brick-and-mortar business.
“Many of us are thirsting for more representation, more visibility, and more kinship in the food world,” said Lightman. To that end, future events are in the works, including ones in cities like Portland, Oregon. The goal is to stretch beyond women, too, and amplify all new voices in the artisan baking community, including people of color and gender non-conforming folks.
“We want to create real-life solidarity, and opportunities to repeat the sparks that happened at the first Bread Winners talk,” said Lightman.
Kris Kohler recorded the Bread Winners event; the audio is embedded below and available on Soundcloud.
The post The Women Reviving Heirloom Grains and Flour appeared first on Civil Eats.
]]>The post Bake What We Knead: Solving the Problem of Excess Bread appeared first on Civil Eats.
]]>As a nation, we’re making too much bread. Exactly how much is hard to say, but some estimate that one-third of all the bread made in America goes to waste. In their roadmap to less food waste, ReFED reported that grain products constitute 19 percent of food waste in our country. In New York City, City Harvest redistributed 5.1 million pounds of bread in 2016, or almost 10 percent of the food they collected.
This surplus breaks my heart. I like baking so much that I wrote a book about flour, and spent years learning about how much work goes into getting grain from the field to the mill. That work is not reflected in the cost of flour, which is insulated by economies of scale, the pennies game of milling, and government subsidies ($40 billion between 1995 and 2014). No wonder this ingredient seems disposable.
There’s also the fact that, except in the most exclusive bakeries, a bare shelf is a no-no. Customers expect fresh bread and lots of it. Sugar and fat are also relatively inexpensive, so it is safer to make too much and donate the leftovers than it is to risk running out.
The problem of plenty isn’t exclusive to America. In France and Germany, small bakeries are closing, partially because of the ubiquity of supermarket bread. Baker Pascal Rigo, who reinvented the baked goods at Starbucks, is now building a network of microboulangeries in France, hoping to revive the traditions of local baking. I think we should take a page from this model, and scale back bread production, too.
I’m not saying we should harken back to another era entirely. Before factory bread was the norm in America, many women spent their only day off baking large batches of bread. Yet the solution, which began with horse-drawn carts delivering factory-baked bread, has ballooned, bringing with it all kinds of industrial-scale problems. Even in the manufacturing process, this kind of bread can generate great waste. If one machine on the line breaks down, 90,000 pounds of dough can suddenly go “off-track,” destined to be sold into animal feed or other secondary markets.
Managing excess dough and baked goods in smaller-scale bakeries is not as clumsy, but still a part of business. And these businesses expect charities to absorb the extra. But people living in poverty already have access to easy calories, and even large operations like mine limit what we accept. Our shelf space is limited, and produce is heavy, perishable, and needs a lot of handling.
For instance, I recently sorted through a case of clementines, removing the ones that had burst, and rinsing the rest. The task didn’t take long but it did take time, and not all of our volunteers know how to look at dubious fruit and decide what’s worth saving. But the bread and sweets we pick up are always attractive and ready to serve.
What would happen if we made a lot less bread—and fewer donuts?
What if supermarket bakeries shrank their offerings, creating a sense of abundance in tighter real estate? What if independent bakeries baked only what they thought they could sell and no more? Some high-end bakeries sell out of their legendary treats, and they survive customer disappointment. Some even thrive on it.
What if we had to order bread like we order birthday cakes? In some circuits, this is the standard. Community supported bakeries (CSBs) sell subscriptions to loaves, just as community supported agriculture (CSA) farms sell seasonal subscriptions to a farm’s products. Sarah Owens, a James Beard Award-winning cookbook author, ran BK17 Bakery from her Brooklyn apartment that way. Many microbakery enterprises like hers only bake the loaves that people pre-order. I know these models can’t replace the way most of us buy our bread, but they suggest efficiencies that can help trim production and shift the burden of excess food further upstream.
As a home baker, I can’t bear to let any of the bread I bake go to waste. The remnants become breadcrumbs, and end up in mac & cheese, inside fish cakes, and even in sweet cakes, between berries and whipped cream. Such frugality is evident in old cookbooks, which use breadcrumbs galore. One baker who was trained in Germany once told me that his first task as an apprentice was grinding leftover bread to use in more dough.
Here’s another solution: Toast Ale, the brainchild of food waste activist Tristram Stuart. Launched in England, and now coming to the United States via Chelsea Brewing, the beer is made using 40 percent surplus bread. It replaces fresh grains in the brewing formula, so it preserves resources that would normally go into growing and malting barley, in addition to keeping bread out of the waste stream.
Once upon a time, bread was valuable because it was hard to make. Wheat was tough to grow and mill. Baking bread took time and resources.
Breaking bread remains a symbol of the shared labors involved, and of the necessity of our cooperation. If we could see the work invested by bakers, millers and farmers, whether small-scale or industrial, that symbol might gain real meaning again. And feeding each other, especially the poorest among us, would mean more than disposing of surplus foods.
The post Bake What We Knead: Solving the Problem of Excess Bread appeared first on Civil Eats.
]]>The post An Elder Statesman of Local Grains is Having Doubts About the Crop appeared first on Civil Eats.
]]>Now, he would like to write an epilogue. And he has been composing that imaginary piece of writing as he speaks in front of various groups, most recently 40 people working in the local grain world who gathered for a meeting at the Paicines Ranch in California.
Lazor wore red suspenders over his plaid shirt and ample belly and showed pictures of machinery. He talked about his tractors and seed cleaners like a parent, with equal parts fondness and frustration.
“We started going forward by going backward,” Lazor said of his beginnings with grains. While his wife Anne was finishing college in Wisconsin, he observed how Amish farmers worked. Once the couple had their farmstead in Vermont, they “stooked” or cured their wheat in an old-fashioned style, and people came from miles around to see what no one had done since the 1950s.
Lazor has collected information from generations of farmers, from the Amish to the Quebecois growers he interrogated, 30 miles north of his home. He has gathered equipment that was very old and abandoned, and replaced those machines with newer ones.
Lazor talks and writes about his trials and errors as a grain grower in an engaging, accessible style. Perhaps this is because, at his core, Lazor is a communicator, eager to convey what he’s learned. The Organic Grain Grower allowed him to share the knowledge entrusted to him, and mentor a new wave of farmers.
Yet being a mentor doesn’t mean Lazor has stopped learning. At 65, he is just as curious as ever and ready to try new methods—and a recent period of illness gave him a lot of time to reflect on the big picture of food, farming, and the environment.
“I want to move to a much more grass and legume-based type of agriculture with our dairy herd,” he told the farmers, millers, and bakers at the California event. Given the purpose of this particular meeting—to enable more small-scale grain projects around the country—his announcement was surprising. But he wanted to bring his audience up-to-date.
“As lovers of grain we really need to think about the health of our soils. We have to get over the glory of all this iron,” he said, pointing to his heavy equipment.
Each piece of machinery seems to ask for another, Lazor said. It is easy to get wrapped up in seeking one more screen for the seed cleaner and a better way to dry a crop for storage. In organic production, tillage is the workaround for chemical weed control, and perfecting your tools for the task can become an obsession.
“I’ve got 27 tractors,” Harold Wilken, an Illinois farmer in the audience that day, confessed with a laugh. “I know I’ve got a problem.”
Wilken runs Janie’s Farm, an organic grain farm in an area dominated by large, conventional corn and soy operations. Wilken has moved into into milling and other seed processing, as small-scale grain growers often do. Most grains—food and feed grade—are grown for commodity markets, and regional storage and processing facilities don’t exist. The idea of growing staple grain crops for local use is just reappearing, because most of the markets and infrastructure vanished by the 1930s or so. Consumers are hungry for alternatives to common grain products, but commodity grains are so inexpensive that developing those alternatives is taking time.
As farmers consider feeding that growing consumer appetite, Lazor is cautionary. “We have to think beyond bushels and bins to think about this little mantel of soil that covers the earth,” he said. “There’s more to farming than tilling and planting and harvesting.” As more and more scientific research shows, no-till farming and well-managed grassland both build healthy soil, and that soil retains water in times of drought and absorbs carbon dioxide that would otherwise warm the atmosphere.
Lazor urges people to raise animals as a complement to grains and other row crops.
He also advises farmers to let the land go “back to sod” as often as possible. Grain crops are “heavy feeders,” meaning they deplete soil nutrients that sod crops like alfalfa, timothy, and clover can help restore. He advises long rotations, cycling through different plant families to throw off fungal, bacterial and other plant and soil pests. He also recommends looking into low- or no-till methods, to help protect soil structure and prevent erosion.
For farmers in New England interested in food grade grains, Lazor recommends growing hulless oats because they are one of the grain crops the climate favors. And instead of growing soy or barley for animals, he says, grow animals the best forage grasses you can. Really well-tended grassland supports both animal health and soil health. Photosynthesis is a more direct tool to harvest energy from the sun than growing grains to feed animals, he points out.
That said, Jack Lazor is still planting grains. The granary dominates his farmscape, high atop a hill. Inside, stone mills make Early Riser corn, an open pollinated variety, into cornmeal, and grind wheat into flour.
But right now, he’s also conducting field trials at Butterworks Farm with Heather Darby from the University of Vermont Crop and Soils team, to find out how to grow nutrient dense forage—or the plants present in a pasture. Ultimately, this small-scale grain afficianado wants to short circuit the need for grains as animal feed.
If you climb to the top of the skinny steep stairs in the farm’s mill and look out the cupola, and you will see some farms, but mostly forest and mountains. The Northeast Kingdom, as that edge of the earth is known, might feel like the end of civilization, but the farm is at another beginning. And Jack Lazor is holding the past, present, and future in mind as he tries to cultivate the best ways to live and work with both kinds of grasses—the ones animals can eat directly and the ones that make the edible seeds we call grains.
The post An Elder Statesman of Local Grains is Having Doubts About the Crop appeared first on Civil Eats.
]]>The post Baking With Local Flour: A 2-Way Conversation appeared first on Civil Eats.
]]>“You have to be reading your dough all the time,” Senders says to students. “This is a romantic question: What does the dough want?”
While local flours are just coming on the radar for mainstream eaters, they’ve been around long enough to earn a bad rap with commercial bakers. Unlike flour sold under national brands, which are a blend of the product of acres of industrial-scale grain fields, local flour is seen as unpredictable. Bakeries are reluctant to gamble with irregularities in protein and moisture content because the losses in time, dough, and product can be considerable.
But wait, didn’t all flour used to be local?
Indeed, before the prairie became the place to grow nearly all our wheat and other grains, all farming, milling, and baking happened close to home. If you ended up with low protein flour, you couldn’t opt not to bake with it. Back then, bakers had to have a deep understanding of flour and a tolerance for the obstacles seasonal variations could present.
Today, these skills are making a comeback. Senders’ one-day workshops, which he co-teaches with two other bakers, are crash courses in understanding the idiosyncrasies of this ingredient.
“One of the great complaints about local flour is it’s too variable,” he told a recent class. “If the baker is not being precise, there’s way more variability on [his/her choices] than in any flour ever milled.”
Some of the students nodded. Day to day, a baker makes lots of tiny and inadvertent changes. Inaccurate measuring, lack of attention to timing, or the chemical and biological processes responsible for bread can add up to bad loaves. Professional and home bakers know how much work it takes to make any flour, let alone local ones untamed by blending, into bread.
“Traditionally, it’s said that the baker plays with time and temperature, but of course there’s plenty more than that,” said Senders. “You can adjust the quantity and vigor. You can play with the length and intensity of the mix … and so on.”
In a sense, the baker, the ingredients, and fermentation process are in conversation. Local flour just requires a little more listening. And that’s not the only dialogue that matters. Fresh flour means the farmer listens to the land, and talks to the miller about what has grown. The miller talks to the baker before the baker begins to chat with dough.
Wide Awake Bakery is now three-years-old, and part of a farmer-miller-baker partnership. Farmer Thor Oechsner co-owner in the bakery, also owns Farmer Ground Flour, which stone mills organically grown New York State grains. Millers Greg Mol and Neal Johnston are in contact with both the baker and the farmer, working in a way that has gone out of fashion. As a well-informed user and interpreter of this particular flour, Senders can also talk to the mill’s commercial customers. He speaks bread.
At the industrial scale, there is little communication between the people who handle grain. Farmers talk to grain merchants, who deliver grain to mills. Both grains and flours are created to hit performance specifications for baking. In effect, numbers talk to numbers. As the food chain shrinks, people have to talk to people again.
Organizations throughout the country are collaborating to foster these conversations. In the Northeast, a number of groups are bringing together key players. Among them are GrowNYC, which runs farmers’ markets throughout the city, and OGRIN, the Organic Research and Information Sharing Network. They are both partners on grant projects, like a recent one from the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Rural Microentrepreneur Assistance Program, which led to Senders’ classes.
The classes are a great way to introduce people to local flour. Senders teaches at the bakery and in other settings, like Northeast Organic Farming Association of New York’s winter conference. His classes attract a range of bakers. Some of these people are farmers, too, looking for a way to add value to what they grow. And one man came to Ithaca from Canada, seeking information as he planned a small farming, milling, and baking enterprise.
Other people are looking to build their baking skills. A couple from the Adirondacks came to research a bakery project. And a serious home baker traveled from Maryland to get clues about working with freshly milled flour.
“A lot of people have been baking for years and everything has been hunky dory. Then they taste [local] bread, and they want to up their game,” Senders said. “This thing that appeared to be not mysterious at all was suddenly made mysterious again.”
As a teacher, he then works to remove some of the mystery, beginning with an analysis of what makes a good loaf.
“Bread is like a balloon full of little tiny balloons,” he said recently, diving into a tiny treatise on gluten, how it is formed, and how gluten quality varies with different grains, like rye and spelt. In Senders’ classes, you can sense people’s interest rising like dough as he explains the principles, theory, and science of bread. He covers the structures of grain kernels so people can understand both stone and roller milling procedures, and how the resulting flours work differently.
Everyone gets a chance to calculate desired dough temperature, fussing with water, weighing and mixing doughs, and shaping and baking loaves.
As a hint of the size of the undertaking that is bread, Senders refers to advice he received from Jeffrey Hammelman, director of King Arthur’s Bakery and author of the book Bread: A Baker’s Book of Techniques and Recipes: “You can never master bread,” Hamelman told him. “You’re just happy to befriend it.”
Top photo by Allison Usavage (see more of Allison’s shots of Stephen and his class in this photo essay).
Photo of Stephen within the story by Rachel Louise Lodder.
The post Baking With Local Flour: A 2-Way Conversation appeared first on Civil Eats.
]]>The post The Wheat Revolution Will Not Be Genetically Engineered appeared first on Civil Eats.
]]>Wheat farmers in the Pacific Northwest export up to 90 percent of their harvest; most of it is used to make noodles in Asia. “We are taking this situation very seriously and have launched a formal investigation,” said Michael Firko, of the USDA’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, in a press release.
The issue of genetic engineering of crops has been in the news in Washington state, as I-522, a GE labeling initiative moves forward to the November 2013 ballot. While the Washington Association of Wheat Growers has been dismissive of claims that labeling would affect farmers’ abilities to export wheat, a response to the announcement of the discovery of the GE wheat in Oregon emphasized the safety of the food, and sought understanding from trade partners as the investigation continues.
Farmers in the east side of Washington grow 2.5 million acres of wheat, much of it the soft white wheat aimed for Asian markets. West of the Cascades, other markets for wheat are being cultivated. Farmers in this area are poised to feed the informed eaters who want grains with more identity than the anonymous products of the state’s grain belt.
Washington State University’s Mount Vernon Research and Extension Station tests 40,000 varieties of wheat each year–none of them genetically engineered. When Stephen Jones, director of the station, was the winter wheat breeder for Washington State University in Pullman, from 1995-2007, he struggled openly with farmer interest in GE crops. He wouldn’t breed anything that took ownership away from farmers and put it in the hands of corporations.
While all seed breeding seeks to develop specific traits, genetic engineering works through gene transfer, and can cross species barriers, which classical plant breeding cannot. Another reason genetic plant breeding is favored is the speed at which desired traits can be grown out. Jones is content to work at the pace of plants.
Plants have been hybridizing without human intervention for millennia. Jones and other plant breeders use classical breeding methods, relying on pollen to achieve results just as their peers did in the 1800s, when hybridization first became a habit.
“We make a cross in a greenhouse, put a male with a female in a dialysis sleeve,” said Jones. “Two generations out we plant test plots.”
However, even hybrids are perceived by some consumers as bad. The lack of transparency about genetic modification is adding to consumer confusion about seed breeding in general. Wheat breeding is taking a big hit from misconceptions promoted in the book Wheat Belly, which attacks modern wheat hybrids, claiming they are addictive and make people fat.
These fears and other concerns about gluten are giving gluten-free products a fierce market presence. On the other side, there is a separate, small but strong movement to relocalize grains, and Jones is part of it.
Across the country, farmers are putting grains in ground that haven’t seen a flour mill or malthouse for nearly a century. Researchers like Jones are working to help farmers find varieties that grow well in these areas, and also serve the needs of bakers and brewers. Conferences on grains and bread–like the Kneading Conference West, which Jones helps organize–are driving the movement forward.
“If you look at Iowa, this is what’s wrong with agriculture,” he said in Vermont in March, showing a 2008 USDA map that highlighted wheat production with green dots. The state was nearly white. “One hundred years ago, Iowa would be bright green. Now it’s wall to wall corn and soybeans. Winter wheat avoids drought. Corn and soy do not.”
The Northern Grain Growers Association had invited him to speak on the topic of growing grains “out of place,” or beyond the regions where the commodity crop is generally produced–eastern Washington and Oregon, Montana, the Dakotas, and Kansas. Jones gave a similar presentation in Tacoma at the Cascadia Grains Conference in January.
In the last century, same as other parts of our food supply, grain production was centralized. A staple food became a commodity crop, and the farmer know-how, and equipment needed to grow grains regionally was lost.
The research station builds on what farmers in the Skagit Valley and elsewhere in western Washington do know–how to grow commodity grains–with a goal of creating a closed loop system to meet the needs of farms and eaters in a region, from animal feed to flour and malting barley.
“These aren’t wheat farmers, these are farmers who grow wheat,” Jones said at his office and labs. Wheat farmers in eastern Washington grow large acres of commodity grains and little else. Farmers in his part of the state can’t afford to grow grains as their main crop. The land is too valuable, and the income from wheat is too low. Still, every few years, tulip, vegetable and seed farmers grow grains to break disease cycles and build up organic matter in the soil.
Growing the same plants year after year courts pathogens and pests. Grains are in the grass family, offering a break from the problems invited by other families of plants. Each family has different biological foes, so rotations help plants handle problems like funguses and bugs. Grains also add organic matter to the soil. Adding value to the grains farmers grow in rotation boosts farm economies as well as soil. Keeping those grains at home is key to Jones for many reasons, and not just because local food is in right now.
“I do like to get beyond the cliché of local and heirloom,” he said, and get to the root of the matter, which is to keep farmers farming in an area facing heavy development pressure.
News of GE wheat may well serve this mission, as consumer interest in non-commodity non-GE wheat could rise. Meanwhile, wheat farmers will have to contend with the risk of cross-contamination from this errant wheat–and the inadequacies of a regulatory system unprepared to ensure that it doesn’t happen again.
Photo by Shutterstock
The post The Wheat Revolution Will Not Be Genetically Engineered appeared first on Civil Eats.
]]>The post Putting Culture Back into Agriculture appeared first on Civil Eats.
]]>“I used to be a faceless producer,” David Rowley said of his last job in conventional agriculture. “We grew two to three tons of tomatoes a week, starting in February. There were six people, no weeds, and no pests.”
At the end of 2000, three things happened that led this farmer from old school ag back to the older school of ag, and into organics and direct marketing. Fuel prices went through the roof, pushing energy costs for the Pennsylvania greenhouses from $15,000 a month to $45,000 a month. A change of management occurred, and most significantly, Rowley got ill and attributed it to pesticides.
As he repaired his health and revised his career, the idea of looking the customer right in the eye and saying the food he grew was clean became imperative. His illness was making him physically understand the importance of nontoxic production. Mentally, he understood organics through a very clever interpreter: his two-year old daughter.
Watching his child, who would not eat supermarket strawberries, devour strawberries from the CSA at home and in the field was another arrow toward this other way of farming. The transparency of the relationship between the farmer, the land, and the consumer was critical as he considered how he would live and work.
“When I was working for other people I had a job. It was a business,” Rowley says, recalling the distance he kept between his livelihood and his living. That gap has been closing ever since.
Monkshood Nursery started in New York’s Hudson Valley in 2001. From scratch, the operation was certified organic, and grew only herbs, selling them directly to the consumer at farmers markets. Now David is growing vegetables and herbs in 10 greenhouses and a number of fields in Stuyvesant, near the Hudson River. The produce makes its way to markets in New York City and Troy.
Last fall’s incredible rains dumped twenty inches of rain and the farm lost six acres of produce and two greenhouses full of food over the course of ten days. The crops yellowed and went moldy, suffocating the plants.
Rebuilding the business after such a massive blow was nothing he could do alone. Luckily, Rowley was already undertaking a restructuring of the farm with the help of some broad community shoulders–Columbia Land Conservancy, Scenic Hudson, and the Hudson Valley Agribusiness Development Corporation. These groups and his neighbors helped secure development rights for more than 150 acres. The Phillips’ family sold the farm they’d leased to Monkshood for years, and Kieran Goodwin and Catherine Rocco donated an easement on adjacent land to keep this parcel of land in agricultural production.
After the rains, Rowley also had to retool the farm’s infrastructure. With more help from his neighbors, he had six greenhouses built, kitted out to fit a tractor and all its attachments.
Rowley’s been in greenhouses much of his career, and a lot of the food he grows is still under cover. However, he and his crew also work in the open fields, and this shift can be seen as a metaphor for the gradual and continuing opening of his work and life.
Until recently, he thought of the work at the farm as very separate from the connections he made at the farmers market. He is a very affable fellow, and loves the connections he makes with people.
“I used to think on the farm, it’s just me, and at the market I’m hanging out,” Rowley says. Hanging out being shorthand for the juicy human intersections that make direct marketing such an effective selling point. Anyone who’s shopped at a farmers market knows you’re not just buying beets, you are buying a particular vendor’s beets, or carrots, or bacon. That food becomes an emblem of attachment, the relationship between the ground and the harvester’s hand made visible, and then edible.
The popularity of this marketing method is evident in the explosion of farmers markets. USDA counted fewer than 2000 in 1994, and this year, there are almost 8000 nationally. This so-called new way of selling mirrors old-fashioned public markets and produce carts that went door-to-door delivering vegetables, breads and other foods.
People used to have a lot of intersections with food, and the future of farming depends on increasing those intersections, from first graders planting onion sets, to twenty, thirty and forty-somethings dancing under a blue moon.
Blue moon dancing happened the last night of August at Monkshood. Severine von Tscharner Fleming of The Greenhorns helped Rowley with outreach this summer, ending with a big party that landed bands and eighty people on the farm for a big cookout on the blue moon.
“Severine helped me see that people should be in all parts of the farm,” says Rowley. He wants more farmers on the farm, too, and is working to create opportunities for young farmers to build their own resource base under the umbrella of Monkshood.
Fleming is the muscle behind a lot of beginning farmer projects, including the documentary The Greenhorns and Farm Hack, which is hosting a grassroots charette aimed at tools for small grain processing in Ithaca in October.
As farming evolves, she sees a danger in the desire to avatarize any and every experience. If traditional farmers are stereotyped in a few words, the prototype of the mod young farmer is one of a million words, chatted, tweeted, and Facebooked, either directly or on their behalf.
But are these farmers so different from what you might consider the traditional, taciturn farmer who wholesales vegetables or grows commodity crops? Chatty people are everywhere, but if you’re growing hundreds or thousands of acres, chances are you’re not going to interface much with your customers.
Socialization has always been a part of farming. Think of barnraising, and entire villages scything the wheat harvest. Food used to be too big a job to not have the community involved. Social media might not be the goose that lays the golden egg for food production, but it does help us inch forward as people experiment with ways to reincorporate humanity into agriculture.
“What I want to figure out in terms of social media business is how do we bring back the core ideas of the grange, stewardship and ethics and banding together and cooperative spirit?” asked Fleming. “What would be the techno futurist or community-utopia online version of that? Because I feel like that there’s a social technology that’s due for revival.”
A version of this story originally published at Metroland
The post Putting Culture Back into Agriculture appeared first on Civil Eats.
]]>The post Bring Back Local Grains! One Man’s Quest in Upstate NY appeared first on Civil Eats.
]]>Don Lewis fell into flour because of his chickens. Back in the late 1990s, he went to Lightning Tree Farm for organic chicken feed and saw that Alton Earnhart was growing wheat. The farmer offered him a bag of flour, and this piece of wheat history began.
At the time, Lewis sold baked goods featuring his own honey at New York City’s Greenmarkets, so of course he was intrigued by the farmer’s flour. As a result, he began to incorporate local flour into all his products, increasing the percentage he used each year and upping the acreage he asked Earnhart to grow. All the while, Lewis educated consumers about ingredients as he offered samples.
In the early 1980s Lewis used samples to discuss the honey he produced. When he started baking bread with local grains, he also used the belly as a point of mental sale.
Since 2008 Lewis has run Wild Hive Bakery and Café, a Hudson Valley shop and eatery that he is now closing in order to focus on his passion: redeveloping a regional grains system.
“I did not open the café to be a restaurateur,” Lewis explains. “I opened it to get local ingredients into local stomachs. That was the objective. I feel like the consumer base now is tremendous and awareness is tremendous and what I need to do is to really focus on the supply and processing end.”
I first encountered local Hudson Valley grains when my husband brought me an oatmeal ganache bar from Wild Hive. Since I’m a baker and I romance the past I already had a fondness for grains and their history.
By necessity, all flour used to be local. I knew that flour was milled near me on the Poestenkill in Troy, New York. Previously, the Erie Canal pushed wheat production and milling to Western New York, and developments in transportation and technology pushed it further west.
But knowing that anyone was growing grains in New York State now wowed me. I began to pay attention, and learned about farmers and researchers at NOFA-New York’s conference in January 2011. Last July, I got to tour the mill at Wild Hive, thanks to New York Farm to Bakery, a project that paired bakers from New York City with upstate millers and farmers.
“A lot of the growers in Upstate New York and the Northeast are [already] growing organic grain for the organic milk industry,” Lewis said. Hearing they can get a better price growing for the human consumption market intrigues them.
Humid and potentially wet summers pose challenges to growing grains in the region, as does post harvest handling, but the chance to break out of a commodity system is appealing to farmers. Witnessing the success and strength of Wild Hive’s partnership with Earnhart shows that another way of selling is possible.
In 2006, Lewis began to run the bakery entirely on his own flour, and was using 20 tons of locally grown grain annually. He was milling in a storage trailer at his home, and baking in a certified kitchen at home too. In 2008, he moved the bakery in the back of the storefront, and shortly afterwards, moved the mill to a nearby barn.
Amping up his milling capacity at this facility helped amp up farmer production, and consumer demand. Eataly, an Italian emporium in New York City, pursued him and doubled the flour production at Wild Hive; their bakery makes 1000 loaves a day with Wild Hive flour, including a special grind for ciabatta loaves that Lewis mastered under guidance from Italian bakers. The fact that this big bakery and others are using Wild Hive flour makes Lewis’ transition possible.
Lewis is driven to work for regional food security. His work at Wild Hive is a model that’s inspired groups in the Northeast to pursue collaborative relationships around growing, processing and baking grains. Infrastructure for harvest, post harvest handling, and storage are the weakest points in these operations. With the help of funding from USDA Organic Research and Extension Initiative granted to Cornell, OGRIN, NOFA-NY and PASA and researchers at Cornell are working on these issues for growers, including a mobile processing unit that Robert Perry from NOFA-NY is assembling.
Lewis has been working on these issues between field and flour, too, and now he can tackle them with more focus.
“The most important thing is bringing on new growers and getting more interest in growing in the valley and in the region, and expanding the production abilities for myself and then for others,” Lewis said.
Tools he wants to incorporate into an expansion of the mill include a grain cleaner and other equipment that farmers might not have, but need, to handle grains. Lewis has worked with the Hudson Valley AgriBusiness Development Corporation, and he expects to again as he expands the Wild Hive Community Grain Project.
The story of Wild Hive won’t end now that the bakery and café are closed. The tale will keep opening up futures, just as a bag of flour made one man a miller, and changed another man’s farming to include more and more grains. That the miller always bought the grains he asked the farmer to grow gave other farmers confidence in him, and in this market for local grains.
“The supply is there, the distribution is there, but it’s not up to me to do it all. I did all that I’ve done because it needed to be done,” he said. “Now there’s other people stepping up. That’s why they call it a system, not a monopoly.”
The post Bring Back Local Grains! One Man’s Quest in Upstate NY appeared first on Civil Eats.
]]>