Rollins Defends USDA's Local Food Cuts and Funding Freeze, Says She Will Move Staff Out of DC | Civil Eats
A logo showing the Civil Eats Food Policy Tracker, looking like a radar following food policy proposals and actions

Rollins Defends USDA’s Local Food Cuts and Funding Freeze, Says She Will Move Staff Out of DC

The Secretary of Agriculture appeared in front of Congress for the first time to answer questions about the president’s proposed budget.

May 6, 2025 – During her first appearance in front of Congress as Secretary of Agriculture, Brooke Rollins defended both USDA’s funding freeze and cuts to local food programs, research, and staff. She also said she’ll unveil a plan to move more USDA staff out of Washington, D.C. within the next few weeks.

Unlock the Full Story with a Civil Eats Membership

Expand your understanding of food systems as a Civil Eats member. Enjoy unlimited access to our groundbreaking reporting, engage with experts, and connect with a community of changemakers.

Join today

The hearing today in front of the Senate Appropriations Committee’s agriculture subcommittee was scheduled to question Rollins about the President’s budget, released Friday. (She will appear in front of the House’s version of the same committee tomorrow.) The budget includes deep cuts to USDA spending, but it will not be enacted as is, since it will need a simple majority vote to pass in Congress, and there is some level of bipartisan opposition to cuts of that magnitude. Still, the budget reflects the president’s desire to slash spending across most agencies, and Rollins has been prioritizing that task during her first 82 days on the job.

Democrats grilled her on how cuts and freezes are impacting farmers and hungry families, while Republicans repeatedly praised her commitment to eliminating bureaucracy.  However, many Senators shared concerns that crossed party lines, particularly about potential cuts to Farm Service Agency (FSA) staff who work directly with farmers in rural areas, freezing or cutting agriculture research, and the elimination of popular USAID programs that purchased American farm products to provide international food aid.

Here are the topics Rollins was asked about the most.

On the restructuring of the USDA and staff cuts: Republicans said they supported downsizing the agency, but many joined Democrats in asking Rollins to resist cutting staff at local FSA offices. “We do not have sufficient personnel in those county offices today,” said Senator Jerry Moran (R-Kansas). Rollins said FSA offices “remain a priority” and that the agency is not currently cutting staff or closing offices, but that the FSA is “also working to be again more efficient with online technical assistance so that in the future we may not rely so much on an on-the-ground presence.” Some FSA offices have already been targeted by DOGE for closure and the president’s budget would cut $358 million in FSA salaries and expenses.

Rollins confirmed that 15,000 USDA staff had accepted the administration’s deferred resignation offer, on top of earlier layoffs. Through those processes, she said the agency had lost people in key positions and is now “actively recruiting” to fill those positions.

banner showing a radar tracking screen and the words

“You let people go—or however you want to characterize it—who knew these jobs, and now you’re looking for people to fill these jobs because now we know how essential they are,” said Senator Patty Murray (D-Washington). “That doesn’t seem to me to be very efficient.”

In response to a question posed by Senator Deb Fischer (R-Nebraska), Rollins said the agency is very close to finalizing a plan to move USDA staff from D.C. offices to other locations. “We are very in the weeds on that, and an announcement is forthcoming,” she said. During the last Trump administration, the USDA moved its Economic Research Service to Kansas City, leading to major losses in experienced staff with significant costs to taxpayers.

On cuts to food aid and school food programs: Democrats grilled Rollins on her decision to end two programs that move food from local farms into school and food banks and cuts to The Emergency Food Assistance Program (TEFAP). Each time, Rollins said the local food programs were COVID-era programs that were not intended to continue. “It was the decision of our president and this administration that perhaps that COVID-era program had fulfilled its purpose,” she said. She also responded to each Senator with numbers saying their states still had money in the bank to spend on local food.

“I can’t speak to what the state is doing, and we’ll be happy to run that to the ground, but the people I’m hearing from are literally the schools and the producers,” said Senator Martin Heinrich (D-New Mexico).

During an exchange with Senator Jeff Merkley (D-Oregon) in which he asked about the $500 million that the USDA cut from TEFAP, which was authorized in 1981, Rollins appeared to confuse TEFAP with the local food programs, calling it a “COVID-era program.”

On farmer grant funds that have been frozen: Appropriations Committee Chair Susan Collins (R-Maine) asked Rollins to provide an update on which grant programs are still frozen and a timeline for when her review would be finished.

We’ll bring the news to you.

Get the weekly Civil Eats newsletter, delivered to your inbox.

“We are working around the clock, going line by line by line,” she said. “We’re down to the final $5 billion out of, I believe, almost $20 billion of frozen funds.”

But Democrats came back to the point over and over. “What I’ve heard from farmers over the past 100 days of this administration is that they’re not sure they can trust the federal government anymore,” said Senator Jeanne Shaheen (D-New Hampshire). “I’ve heard from farmers across our state who no longer know if they can rely on the federal government honoring a basic signed contract.”

On cuts to agriculture research: Murray, Fischer, and Senator Gary Peters (D-Michigan) all brought up concerns about cuts to agricultural research. The president’s budget calls for a $159 million cut from the Agricultural Research Service (ARS), but Rollins said that only represents a 7 percent decrease and that cuts would be focused on closing outdated facilities. “It shouldn’t affect the key, most important parts of the research,” she said. The funding freeze and cuts to grants have already upended some important agricultural research. (Link to this post.)

You’d be a great Civil Eats member…

Civil Eats is a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, and we count on our members to keep producing our award-winning work.

Readers like you are the reason why we’re able to keep digging deep into stories you won’t find anywhere else. When you become a member, your support directly funds our journalism—from paying our reporters to keeping the internet on in our remote offices across the United States.

Your membership will also come with great benefits, including our award-winning newsletter, The Deep Dish, which is full of relevant and timely reporting, access to our members’ Slack community, and online salons as a way to engage with reporters, food and agriculture experts, and each other.

Civil Eats Supporting Membership $60/year $6/month
Give One, Get One Membership $100/year
Learn more about our membership program

Lisa Held is Civil Eats’ senior staff reporter and contributing editor. Read more >

Like the story?
Join the conversation.

Leave a Comment

More from

Food Policy Tracker

Featured

Popular

House Ag Committee Continues Efforts to Block Animal Welfare Rules

An overhead view of a farm and farmland, with the Civil Eats Food Policy Tracker logo superimposed. (Photo credit: John Reed, Unsplash)

Op-ed: Through Acts of Solidarity, We Can Support Immigrants in the Food Chain and Beyond

Immigrant farmers, food workers, and vendors are a critical part of our food system. Here’s how to help them here in LA and nationwide (Photo credit: LA Food Policy Council).

What Bees Can Teach Us About Survival and Well-being

USDA Renews Effort to Collect SNAP User Data, Prompting Privacy and Immigration Concerns

A logo showing the Civil Eats Food Policy Tracker, looking like a radar following food policy proposals and actions