Agriculture Appropriations Bill Could Gut Landmark Farmer Protections | Civil Eats
A logo showing the Civil Eats Food Policy Tracker, looking like a radar following food policy proposals and actions

Agriculture Appropriations Bill Could Gut Landmark Farmer Protections

Republicans included provisions to prevent the implementation and enforcement of Packers and Stockyards rules completed under Biden.

June 9, 2025 – Last week, House Republicans tucked a provision into a draft agriculture funding bill that would take away the ability of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to implement and enforce a package of rules the last administration completed to protect farmers from meatpacker abuse.

Unlock the Full Story with a Civil Eats Membership

Expand your understanding of food systems as a Civil Eats member. Enjoy unlimited access to our groundbreaking reporting, engage with experts, and connect with a community of changemakers.

Join today

Under President Joe Biden, the USDA finalized three rules and proposed a fourth related to the Packers and Stockyards Act, a law that has been on the books for more than a century but has lacked teeth. Farmers and ranchers have fought for decades to strengthen the protections, especially as meatpacking companies have become bigger and more powerful, wielding more influence over the producers who raise the animals and who take on significant costs to do so.

The new rules were a landmark step forward in ensuring fairness in contracts and protecting farmers and ranchers from exploitation by meat companies; their trade groups are already suing to overturn one of the rules. This new bill represents another threat.

Appropriations is solely about allocating funding, so the lawmakers inserted language that prohibits any funds from being used to write, publish, finalize, implement, or enforce the four rules, essentially killing them. The only thing the bill would allow funds to be used for is to “withdraw or rescind” the rules.

banner showing a radar tracking screen and the words

Members of the full Appropriations Committee are expected to vote on the bill this week. If it passes, it would then have to be approved by the full House of Representatives and move to the Senate. The bill also includes a variety of significant spending cuts to align with the Trump administration’s budget requests, and its chances for success within a closely divided Congress are far from certain. (This appropriations process is completely separate from the ongoing negotiations over the Republicans’ One Big Beautiful Bill Act.)

In the meantime, farm groups are mobilizing to oppose the provisions. This afternoon, the influential National Farmers Union (NFU) sent out an action alert urging members to “act now to defeat a bill that threatens family farmers and ranchers everywhere,” by contacting their representatives in Congress. “These rules protect family farmers and ranchers from anticompetitive and abusive practices in the highly consolidated meat and poultry industries,” the NFU wrote.

In a bill summary released by committee, Republicans characterized the changes as “reining in harmful regulations proposed during the Biden administration that dictate how poultry and livestock producers raise and market their animals.” (Link to this post.)

We’ll bring the news to you.

Get the weekly Civil Eats newsletter, delivered to your inbox.

You’d be a great Civil Eats member…

Civil Eats is a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, and we count on our members to keep producing our award-winning work.

Readers like you are the reason why we’re able to keep digging deep into stories you won’t find anywhere else. When you become a member, your support directly funds our journalism—from paying our reporters to keeping the internet on in our remote offices across the United States.

Your membership will also come with great benefits, including our award-winning newsletter, The Deep Dish, which is full of relevant and timely reporting, access to our members’ Slack community, and online salons as a way to engage with reporters, food and agriculture experts, and each other.

Civil Eats Supporting Membership $60/year $6/month
Give One, Get One Membership $100/year
Learn more about our membership program

Lisa Held is Civil Eats’ senior staff reporter and contributing editor. Read more >

Like the story?
Join the conversation.

Leave a Comment

More from

Food Policy Tracker

Featured

Popular

House Ag Committee Continues Efforts to Block Animal Welfare Rules

An overhead view of a farm and farmland, with the Civil Eats Food Policy Tracker logo superimposed. (Photo credit: John Reed, Unsplash)

Op-ed: Through Acts of Solidarity, We Can Support Immigrants in the Food Chain and Beyond

Immigrant farmers, food workers, and vendors are a critical part of our food system. Here’s how to help them here in LA and nationwide (Photo credit: LA Food Policy Council).

What Bees Can Teach Us About Survival and Well-being

USDA Renews Effort to Collect SNAP User Data, Prompting Privacy and Immigration Concerns

A logo showing the Civil Eats Food Policy Tracker, looking like a radar following food policy proposals and actions