Kennedy Says Food Additives and Processed Foods Are Now ‘Central Focus’ of NIH and FDA | Civil Eats Kennedy Says Food Additives, Processed Foods Now Focus of NIH and HHS
A logo showing the Civil Eats Food Policy Tracker, looking like a radar following food policy proposals and actions

Kennedy Says Food Additives and Processed Foods Are Now ‘Central Focus’ of NIH and FDA

The Health and Human Services secretary revealed little new information to lawmakers in back-to-back Congressional hearings. 

May 15, 2025 – During a marathon day of testimony in front of committees in both the House and Senate, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said that dealing with the health impacts of processed foods is now the first priority of the federal government’s most important food and health regulators and researchers.

Unlock the Full Story with a Civil Eats Membership

Expand your understanding of food systems as a Civil Eats member. Enjoy unlimited access to our groundbreaking reporting, engage with experts, and connect with a community of changemakers.

Join today

“One of the big areas of neglect has been linking specific food additives and food processes to the chronic disease epidemic. NIH has neglected that area of study. It is now the central focus of NIH . . . and FDA,” he said, listing ultra-processed foods, sugars, and “10,000 additives” that are in our food as areas of concern. The agencies, he said, are “looking at the impact so that we can put accurate labeling on, and when they’re really dangerous, we can revoke their authorizations.”

Kennedy made the comments in front of the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions during the second of two contentious hearings on Wednesday to consider changes to HHS funding requested in President Trump’s latest budget proposal. But lawmakers didn’t address changes like the budget’s proposed $18 billion in research cuts at NIH and $500 million in new funding to “MAHA initiatives,” focusing instead on topics including measles, vaccines, and drug prices.

banner showing a radar tracking screen and the words

Democrats primarily railed against Kennedy’s downsizing of the agency by 20,000 employees. They also highlighted recent cuts to NIH research as well as health programs for coal miners and 9/11 first responders, which Kennedy has since reversed. But they rarely let him fully answer a question.

When he did respond, he repeatedly said HHS was simply going back to pre-COVID staffing levels. (The Biden administration significantly increased staff at HHS, but the current cuts take staffing back to a much lower level, one not seen since the George W. Bush administration.) He also said he couldn’t answer specific questions about layoffs or the department’s reorganization due to the lawsuit brought by 19 states challenging the legality of those actions, but said “there were no working scientists fired,” which contradicts previous reporting. (A top processed foods researcher also resigned, citing the fact that “unbiased science” became impossible at the agency.)

Kennedy’s comments on the refocusing of NIH and FDA priorities were significant, though, given those agencies’ typical mandates, but he exaggerated HHS’ moves so far. “Twenty years the Democrats have said, ‘We need to revise the GRAS standards.’ I’ve done it in 100 days,” he said. “We’re getting rid of nine petroleum-based, synthetic dyes in our food. Twenty years the Democrats have been saying we want to do this, and I’ve done that in 100 days.” Kennedy directed the FDA to look into changing the GRAS process, but no definitive action has been taken; Senator Roger Marshall (R-Kansas) is working on a bill that could help the process along. On food dyes, Kennedy’s current plan depends on getting food companies to voluntarily remove them. (Link to this post.)

We’ll bring the news to you.

Get the weekly Civil Eats newsletter, delivered to your inbox.

You’d be a great Civil Eats member…

Civil Eats is a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, and we count on our members to keep producing our award-winning work.

Readers like you are the reason why we’re able to keep digging deep into stories you won’t find anywhere else. When you become a member, your support directly funds our journalism—from paying our reporters to keeping the internet on in our remote offices across the United States.

Your membership will also come with great benefits, including our award-winning newsletter, The Deep Dish, which is full of relevant and timely reporting, access to our members’ Slack community, and online salons as a way to engage with reporters, food and agriculture experts, and each other.

Civil Eats Supporting Membership $60/year $6/month
Give One, Get One Membership $100/year
Learn more about our membership program

Lisa Held is Civil Eats’ senior staff reporter and contributing editor. Read more >

Like the story?
Join the conversation.

Leave a Comment

More from

Food Policy Tracker

Featured

Popular

House Ag Committee Continues Efforts to Block Animal Welfare Rules

An overhead view of a farm and farmland, with the Civil Eats Food Policy Tracker logo superimposed. (Photo credit: John Reed, Unsplash)

Op-ed: Through Acts of Solidarity, We Can Support Immigrants in the Food Chain and Beyond

Immigrant farmers, food workers, and vendors are a critical part of our food system. Here’s how to help them here in LA and nationwide (Photo credit: LA Food Policy Council).

What Bees Can Teach Us About Survival and Well-being

USDA Renews Effort to Collect SNAP User Data, Prompting Privacy and Immigration Concerns

A logo showing the Civil Eats Food Policy Tracker, looking like a radar following food policy proposals and actions