House Budget Plan Would Cut SNAP Spending, Increase Funding for Commodity Agriculture | Civil Eats
A logo showing the Civil Eats Food Policy Tracker, looking like a radar following food policy proposals and actions

House Budget Plan Would Cut SNAP Spending, Increase Funding for Commodity Agriculture

It is still very early in the budget reconciliation process, and a final bill could be substantially different.

May 22, 2025 Update:House Republicans passed the tax bill this morning. It will now move to the Senate, where provisions on SNAP spending and farm programs could change significantly.

Unlock the Full Story with a Civil Eats Membership

Expand your understanding of food systems as a Civil Eats member. Enjoy unlimited access to our groundbreaking reporting, engage with experts, and connect with a community of changemakers.

Join today

May 15, 2025 Update – On Wednesday, House Ag Committee Republicans voted along party lines to advance their portion of the bill, with the $290 billion cut in SNAP spending intact. The entire House is now working on advancing the total bill package.

May 13, 2025 – Last night, House Agriculture Committee Chair G.T. Thompson (R-Pennsylvania) revealed a plan to dramatically cut federal spending on food aid while increasing aid to commodity farmers. The provisions—which lawmakers are currently working on as part of the budget reconciliation process—would cut $290 billion in spending on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and increase subsidies for commodity farms by about $60 billion.

“This portion of the One Big, Beautiful Bill restores the [SNAP] program’s original intent, offering a temporary helping hand while encouraging work, cracking down on loopholes exploited by states, and protecting taxpayer dollars while supporting the hardworking men and women of American agriculture,” Thompson said in a statement.

On the SNAP side, the bill text would require any future changes to the Thrifty Food Plan, which determines how much money participants receive each month, to be cost-neutral. (For example, benefit amounts would not be allowed to increase if the mix of foods in the plan was updated based on changing dietary guidelines.) The bill would also increase the number of people who are subject to certain work requirements in several ways. It would make it harder for states to qualify for waivers, and change requirements that currently apply to all SNAP recipients 15 to 60 years old to apply to participants between 17 and 65. And the bill would increase the number of people who qualify as “Able Bodied Adults Without Dependents,” who are subject to stricter requirements, extending their qualifying age from 54 to 64—and by including adults with dependents who are over seven.

banner showing a radar tracking screen and the words

However, the most significant change would be increasing states’ share of the program’s administrative costs from 50 to 75 percent and requiring states to pay for a portion of SNAP benefits, which they have never done before. All states would have to contribute 5 percent of the cost of benefits beginning in 2028. States with higher rates of payment errors, which can be overpayments or underpayments based on administrative mistakes, would contribute more, with the top tier contributing as much as 25 percent.

Experts say those changes would likely force states to cut benefits. “The language is unclear, but it could end SNAP entirely in some parts of the country if states decide the new state funding requirements are impossible for them to meet,” said Ty Jones Cox, the vice president for food assistance at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. Anti-hunger groups said the plan would increase hunger.

On the farm side, the bill text inserts some of the Republican leadership’s farm bill priorities. It would increase the prices paid to commodity growers between 10 and 20 percent, make additional acres eligible for commodity subsidy payments, eliminate payment limits so wealthier farms can access payments, and expand crop insurance. It also appears to combine Inflation Reduction Act funds allocated for conservation with general conservation program funding, meaning that more money would flow to conservation program funding, but it would remove any climate-related focus for the programs.

Democrats on the committee have said cutting SNAP and adding farm bill programs to the tax bill would likely kill the possibility of passing a farm bill later this year.

“The budget reconciliation bill offers a simple deal—pass up a full, five-year farm bill in exchange for dramatically increased farm subsidies funded by hundreds of billions in cuts that will deepen hunger and threaten farmer livelihoods,” said Mike Lavender, the policy director at the National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition, in a statement.

We’ll bring the news to you.

Get the weekly Civil Eats newsletter, delivered to your inbox.

However, it is still very early in the budget reconciliation process. The House Ag Committee will meet tonight to offer amendments and work on the text. Then it will need to be combined with text from other committees, where many big questions are still being worked out on cuts to other programs like Medicaid. If the House gets a final bill together within the next couple of weeks, it will then go to the Senate, where further changes will be made. (Link to this post.)

You’d be a great Civil Eats member…

Civil Eats is a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, and we count on our members to keep producing our award-winning work.

Readers like you are the reason why we’re able to keep digging deep into stories you won’t find anywhere else. When you become a member, your support directly funds our journalism—from paying our reporters to keeping the internet on in our remote offices across the United States.

Your membership will also come with great benefits, including our award-winning newsletter, The Deep Dish, which is full of relevant and timely reporting, access to our members’ Slack community, and online salons as a way to engage with reporters, food and agriculture experts, and each other.

Civil Eats Supporting Membership $60/year $6/month
Give One, Get One Membership $100/year
Learn more about our membership program

Lisa Held is Civil Eats’ senior staff reporter and contributing editor. Read more >

Like the story?
Join the conversation.

Leave a Comment

More from

Food Policy Tracker

Featured

Popular

House Ag Committee Continues Efforts to Block Animal Welfare Rules

An overhead view of a farm and farmland, with the Civil Eats Food Policy Tracker logo superimposed. (Photo credit: John Reed, Unsplash)

Op-ed: Through Acts of Solidarity, We Can Support Immigrants in the Food Chain and Beyond

Immigrant farmers, food workers, and vendors are a critical part of our food system. Here’s how to help them here in LA and nationwide (Photo credit: LA Food Policy Council).

What Bees Can Teach Us About Survival and Well-being

USDA Renews Effort to Collect SNAP User Data, Prompting Privacy and Immigration Concerns

A logo showing the Civil Eats Food Policy Tracker, looking like a radar following food policy proposals and actions