House Democrats Say SNAP Cuts Will Hurt Families, Farmers, and Broader Food System | Civil Eats
Rep. Shontel Brown speaks outside Congress about SNAP funding and how it supports the food system and the economy. (Photo credit: Lisa Held)

House Democrats Say SNAP Cuts Will Hurt Families, Farmers, and Broader Food System

‘SNAP doesn’t just give away money, it powers our economy.’

May 7, 2025 – At a press conference on Capitol Hill today, Democrats on the House Agriculture Committee railed against Republican plans to cut spending on food aid, emphasizing that funding for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) supports hungry families as well as farmers, grocery workers, truckers, and food manufacturers.

Unlock the Full Story with a Civil Eats Membership

Expand your understanding of food systems as a Civil Eats member. Enjoy unlimited access to our groundbreaking reporting, engage with experts, and connect with a community of changemakers.

Join today

“SNAP doesn’t just give away money, it powers our economy,” said Representative Nikki Budzinski (D-Illinois), who spoke along with Ranking Member Angie Craig (D-Minnesota) and Representatives Shontel Brown (D-Ohio) and Jahana Hayes (D-Connecticut).

After the lawmakers spoke, they invited others who rely on SNAP to share their stories. Yolanda Gordon, a U.S. Army veteran, and Meghan Hullinger, a single mother, both spoke about how SNAP benefits had helped them get through difficult times. Two farmers, Kat Becker from Wisconsin, and Carah Ronan from Montana, spoke about how SNAP dollars support their farms. “Farms and nutrition go hand-in-hand,” said Ronan, after detailing how the funds help her provide fresh local produce, eggs, and meat to her community. “Let’s keep it that way.”

The event was one of many that Democrats and anti-hunger advocates organized this week in advance of the Agriculture Committee’s meeting to lay out the details of what they plan to cut, scheduled for next week. While the Republicans who lead the committee are more moderate than others in the party and have resisted deeper cuts to SNAP, the far-right wing of the party appears to be winning the fight. Politico reported yesterday that the House is still expected to make $230 billion in cuts as a part of the party’s plan to fund tax cuts for higher-income Americans.

banner showing a radar tracking screen and the words

“There is nothing fiscally responsible about making more people hungry and more people suffer just to hand out billionaire tax cuts,” Brown said at the conference.

The Wall Street Journal editorial board characterized some of the Republicans’ plans to slash spending—like shifting costs to states and tightening rules around work requirements—as common-sense ways to “fix the dysfunctional federal food assistance program.” However, earlier in the week, at the Food Research and Action Center’s Anti-Hunger Food Policy Conference, a recurring message was that all of those changes would effectively mean fewer people have access to SNAP.

“No one is staying home for $6 a day,” said Itzul Gutierrez, the senior policy advocate for the California Association of Food Banks, responding to a common Republican talking point that more work requirements are necessary to prevent people from taking advantage of SNAP benefits, on one panel. Average benefits are about $6 per day. “That is all part of the effort to kick people off SNAP.”

On Tuesday, the food bank operators and anti-hunger advocates who came to D.C. from across the country rallied at the Capitol and then spent the day meeting with members of Congress to share that argument with legislators. (Link to this post.)

We’ll bring the news to you.

Get the weekly Civil Eats newsletter, delivered to your inbox.

You’d be a great Civil Eats member…

Civil Eats is a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, and we count on our members to keep producing our award-winning work.

Readers like you are the reason why we’re able to keep digging deep into stories you won’t find anywhere else. When you become a member, your support directly funds our journalism—from paying our reporters to keeping the internet on in our remote offices across the United States.

Your membership will also come with great benefits, including our award-winning newsletter, The Deep Dish, which is full of relevant and timely reporting, access to our members’ Slack community, and online salons as a way to engage with reporters, food and agriculture experts, and each other.

Civil Eats Supporting Membership $60/year $6/month
Give One, Get One Membership $100/year
Learn more about our membership program

Lisa Held is Civil Eats’ senior staff reporter and contributing editor. Read more >

Like the story?
Join the conversation.

Leave a Comment

More from

Food Policy Tracker

Featured

Popular

House Ag Committee Continues Efforts to Block Animal Welfare Rules

An overhead view of a farm and farmland, with the Civil Eats Food Policy Tracker logo superimposed. (Photo credit: John Reed, Unsplash)

Op-ed: Through Acts of Solidarity, We Can Support Immigrants in the Food Chain and Beyond

Immigrant farmers, food workers, and vendors are a critical part of our food system. Here’s how to help them here in LA and nationwide (Photo credit: LA Food Policy Council).

What Bees Can Teach Us About Survival and Well-being

USDA Renews Effort to Collect SNAP User Data, Prompting Privacy and Immigration Concerns

A logo showing the Civil Eats Food Policy Tracker, looking like a radar following food policy proposals and actions